Anonymous ID: 3463ca Feb. 27, 2022, 6:37 p.m. No.15741873   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1876 >>2040 >>2349

I really hope somewhere along the way in this stupor, I didn't make a mistake or jump the shark to aggrigously render this all moot and a 100% complete waste of time.

Admittedly, I am not the brightest nor the most organized when trying to convey a point. I have taken a thought and ran with it into graphic form; I hope these can be followed without too much trouble.

As said, IF any of it is plausible and I didn't shit the bed along the way, I would love anons thoughts on logic/relevence/expansion/ect…

In my mind it is all linking up and certain chemical imbalances are going mental.

 

TLDR: I will be posting a short series of rushed graphics in hopes of getting others to look into some thoughts on whether it works, doesn't work, could work, or is completely asinine.

Basically [-21] started either Feb 26th at CPAC but if we were 2 days ahead of schedule, it would have been Feb 28th otherwise on the regular schedule. Q never made a post on Feb 28th during any year so I counted that as a zero day= skipped to March 1st.

Applying the [-21] start to either 26th = Mar 19th or March 1st = Mar 22nd. Then look for applicable posts with any year delta on Mar 19th or 22nd. Then Move on the [-20][-19][-18] for Feb 26th and March 1st and keep checking the posts.

I only made it through [-19] in graphics but will attach a small sample of the posts that would follow continuing the trend on [-14] (March 1st + 14 = March 15th.

 

Pt 1