Anonymous ID: 2c963d Feb. 28, 2022, 3:19 p.m. No.15748299   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8311

>>15748282

>https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/moderna-patented-component-of-coronavirus-three-years-before-pandemic/

https://twitter.com/CuriousCanuckle/status/1496189358621458433

Anonymous ID: 2c963d Feb. 28, 2022, 3:21 p.m. No.15748311   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15748299

>https://twitter.com/CuriousCanuckle/status/1496189358621458433

The stench of the origins of C19 cannot be hid much longer. Either Mother Nature spawned Covid-19 with a novel Furin Cleavage Site (odds 3.21 ×10 −11) or Moderna’s patented FCS Genome (US patent 9,587,003 filed in 2016) was added (odds…I know my answer)

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/lab-leak-theory-new-article-shows

Lab Leak Theory - New article shows link to patented gene in SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage site

Lab leak theories are suddenly very much the MODE (RNA gives us the clue)

The paper states that the absence of the sequence from the BLAST database makes recombination in an intermediate host an unlikely explanation for its presence in SARS-CoV-2. They concluded by saying “The presence in SARS-CoV-2 of a 19-nucleotide RNA sequence encoding an FCS at amino acid 681 of its spike protein with 100% identity to the reverse complement of a proprietary MSH3 mRNA sequence is highly unusual. Potential explanations for this correlation should be further investigated”.

This paper gives further teeth to the lab leak theory and raises questions that should and could have been answered right at the beginning of this pandemic, probably saving countless lives. Why is Moderna’s patented sequence in SARS-CoV-2? Moderna were clearly experimenting with various cancer treatments, using this sequence, but what is the connection between those experiments and SARS-CoV-2? Were they being undertaken in the same laboratory and/or by the same individuals? Is it possible that, through contamination, the sequence ended up in SARS-CoV-2 or is the only way for that to happen through direct manipulation of a coronavirus? If direct manipulation of a virus is the only answer then why was this insertion added when it was known to increase transmission and severity of disease? Why has this information been supressed? Why are no other scientists discussing this?

One other point to note about the article is that is was edited by Xin Yin from the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. Furthermore, it was reviewed by Jitao Chang from the same academy. Is this China throwing Moderna under a bus? Why would China allow this information to be released if not for some ulterior motive?