>>1574852 (previous bread)

None that are actually similar and have significant market penetration (compare the suggestions in link 2 to the stats in link 3). Again, no sauce from you, are you an anon or a shill? We also weren't talking about Google at all, though it's a good example (Market share 72.48% of the world's searches)

https://searchenginewatch.com/2016/08

https://fossbytes.com/best-facebook-alternatives/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users//08/what-are-the-top-10-most-popular-search-engines/

>>1574872

>>1574872

>Facebook built a better one, and grew.

That's a clown lie. Facebook is a continuation of a CIA program. It has had huge support from the shadow government in getting where it is and staying where it is. And yeah, I noticed how you avoided that point before. You are a shill.