Anonymous ID: 80075d March 1, 2022, 7:19 a.m. No.15752933   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2946 >>2949 >>2951 >>2953 >>2997 >>3009 >>3028 >>3039 >>3050 >>3076 >>3077 >>3079 >>3175 >>3256 >>3382

How many of you think that Putin is telling the truth when he says that his goal is to restore law and order to Ukraine by removing the Nazi (DS controlled) government?

 

I'd like this to be the case. But how can this be squared with:

  1. Qs insistence that Putin is controlled by illuminati

  2. Trumps praise for Ukraine leadership

  3. Putin's aggressive and arguably unethical invasion. (If Putin actually had evidence of a genocide in the contested regions, and evidence of malfeasance of Ukrainian leadership, he should have tried the leaders in court - even in their absence - for the world to see the evidence. As it stands, he is perceived as an unhinged aggressor. Evidence would have overcome this.)

Anonymous ID: 80075d March 1, 2022, 7:23 a.m. No.15752951   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2977

>>15752933

Putin is controlled:

 

Post 15

There are more good people than bad. The wizards and warlocks (inside term) will not allow another Satanic Evil POS control our country. Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).

 

Post 133

“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”

Anonymous ID: 80075d March 1, 2022, 7:25 a.m. No.15752972   🗄️.is 🔗kun

To understand why Putin is invading Ukraine, these two speeches he made last week are indispensable

 

No doubt many of you have already watched them. But for those who haven't, they are well worth the 1 12 hours.

 

Vladimir Putin's Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022, ENG Subtitles

https://youtu.be/1qS6J-WbTD8

 

Vladimir Putin's Address on NATO, Ukraine, and Recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk - ENG Subtitle

https://youtu.be/APPjVlUA-gs

55 minutes

Anonymous ID: 80075d March 1, 2022, 7:29 a.m. No.15752997   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15752933

>(If Putin actually had evidence of a genocide in the contested regions, and evidence of malfeasance of Ukrainian leadership, he should have tried the leaders in court - even in their absence - for the world to see the evidence. As it stands, he is perceived as an unhinged aggressor. Evidence would have overcome this.)

 

How do you rationalize invading Ukraine vs. court proceedings? Why is invading Ukraine ethical, even if Putin is telling the truth about his motivations for going in?

 

I'm interested in your opinions because I'm trying to square this myself.

Anonymous ID: 80075d March 1, 2022, 7:35 a.m. No.15753033   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3084 >>3353

>>15753009

For one, Trump could have been telling him how it was going to be now that the white hats were in control, assuming Putin was still being controlled.

 

So while it's possible he met Trump because he was no longer controlled, that's not a necessary precondition for their meeting.