>>1575621
>How would we even know the difference between a capital "I" and a lower case "L"?
see
>>1575618
and/or copypaste txt in a txt editor
and/or change fonts
<Where is VJ?
>Okay, that's right, I forgot.
>I haven't been around much lately. My bad.
no excuses for making false statements about Q posts' content, shouldn't take this so lightly.
(good thing for you i don't have temp ban/forced time-out powers)
great & nice work, thanks, good job going over all of them… so it's just the first two, interdasting
wish i knew too.
been procrastinating a lot of work on signatures (took some time off too, was burning out), we left a lot of those on the backburner… hopefully i can get back to that soon
warning: risk of eyeroll injuries
>>1575994 so good/true
thisness
that quote exists in your mind… try to find elsewhere
yawn.
"but muh concern"… your script is old, it's tiring.
no wonder no one wants to play with you anymore.
the BO = AI is new/funny, though.
i would find it so, so, so funny if after all this bad actors confirmed "uh, no, we did use some bots but not a single AI was ever deployed on qresearch boards". Oops. So many anons chasing AIs… in their minds
so why do you quote something that you can't quote?
then PLEASE do not quote or post a single fucking thing about them here until that date.
NOT A THING.
they are cancer.
love them in secret.
no, those 2 twatter disinfo accounts, fool.
actually if you couldn't understand that, it'd be better if you could not post at all, but of course you will
funny how you switch the subject to JA and call me a shill.
What do you gain from defending and promoting these 2 twatters here?
>can we pls go back to shitting on stupidfag´s and getting them to run away in tears ?
i wish. not sure if/how it's feasible.
not engaging is letting them roam free,
engaging is getting sucked in the stupid…
are you or are you not on /qresearch/?
why ask a question you can verify?
what is your use/purpose?
and yet, he's right nonetheless