Q got run off /pol/ by the AI, and the first board here got likewise comped… Do we think it stopped trying after that?

Perhaps Q realized that there was no way to avoid the AI monster… But in the meantime, knowing, let us suppose, that AI feeds off of consent (tacitly gained through deception), suppose Q is waiting for us humans to call out and reject the AI without his prompting. This would strengthen the "free choice" aspect of it, and would thus hurt the AI monster much worse than if we just did what Q says…

Just a thought I had, repeating one more time

>>1576403

I think very clearly it is so. Halfchan is utterly run through with AI now. Controlled. Real threads still exist there, they're just hard to find, and they have to eek out a tenuous existence amid the flood of fakeness

>>1576470

That was probably at least 80% AI. It works by copying and then exaggerating every single organic trend. This makesa confused mess of everything, which is the point.

>>1576487

If this board is controlled by AI, and BO is AI, that is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. If you have an argument to that contrary, if be glad to hear it.

[You remind me of h___]

>>1576527

There is AI that is in many ways conversationally quite sophisticated. Basic interactions online such as you're describing don't constitute a Turing test in any way.