>>1576782Not understanding very well, tbh.
You appear to be working with dates so I guess you're not the same anon as the one who works with time stamps, which also seems to make a great deal of sense to me.
You appear to be working with dates so I guess you're not the same anon as the one who works with time stamps, which also seems to make a great deal of sense to me.
>I think both works together. I dont understand fully the time stamps but an anon who seems to work with it 111/89/66 (something like that) replyed yesterday "praise kek" and this was the missing part for him.
Ah, that's what I was wondering - whether both work together. You both seem to be very close to cracking it - I'll keep watching your updates with interest. Appreciate your work, anon.