Anonymous ID: ea09ca May 29, 2018, 10:29 a.m. No.1577283   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7295 >>7297

>>1577239

Yes.

funny how i lose internet connection whenever i am about to prove someone wrongโ€ฆ

 

>>1577258

Believe me.

As i am my self of a family that works like that.

You are not allowed to use the name Rothchild if you don't have deep connections to that family.

Like with my family name.

If anyone wants to be part of it they have to ask formal permission and pay a hefty sum to be allowed.

And we can deny them at any point in the process, even after they payed us.

 

Family relations are important in that world. They wouldn't want outsiders to be part of that.

Anonymous ID: ea09ca May 29, 2018, 11:03 a.m. No.1577622   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1577580

I agree with you.

But unfortunately i know a few people that would fit your description and i don't think they get paid.

They believe their "knowledge" gives them them the moral high ground and they feel justified in going onto forums and in their words "Laugh at the morons".

 

Misguided people can be a very destructive force

Anonymous ID: ea09ca May 29, 2018, 11:22 a.m. No.1577843   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1577693

A thought just cropped up.

[Next part of this post is just me thinking out loud in hopes other gets intrigued, i'll start digging this myself]

 

The JFK files that were recently released.

Although heavily redacted.

Do they mention Albert R. Thomas at all?

Was he involved with the investigation and subsequently cover-up?

How involved?

Can this, through personal connections, lead to other possible bad actors?