Anonymous ID: 03b09b March 3, 2022, 5 p.m. No.15775972   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5983 >>6014 >>6080 >>6232

>>15775178 LB

>>Did we just confirm Nunes is in Q group, that Q posts will now be mainstream, that Q, flannel guy, and TS poster are legit, the first comfirmation of a Q group member?

 

That [Q], flannel [guy], and [TS] poster are legit.

Difficult to tell if you are implying the 3 in brackets are all the same person, graphic was blurry.

Flannel [guy?]. Is Q a guy?

Non the less, 2 posts, ‘no posts outside this platform’. After “B” & a year plus of no posts, the only valid way for that to change is for Q to post w/ tripcode & probably an additional verifier of some kind & change it.

Contradiction isn’t good for credibility.

Anonymous ID: 03b09b March 3, 2022, 5:12 p.m. No.15776073   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6199

>>15776014

Not sure what your point is re: /projectcomms/.

Stick with Q posts? This is Qresearch.

I had better? Uh, no.

You’re are not making an argument that validates @q on TS as Q or invalidates 2 Q posts stating clearly, ‘no comms outside of this platform’. That stands until Q changes it, imo.