>>1577840 (lb)
>Who controls ABC
>Who really controls ABC?
Actual owner is absent from https://www.disneyabcpress.com/disneyabctv/disney-abc-senior-executives/
where's the muh joos anons when you need them?
>>1577840 (lb)
>Who controls ABC
>Who really controls ABC?
Actual owner is absent from https://www.disneyabcpress.com/disneyabctv/disney-abc-senior-executives/
where's the muh joos anons when you need them?
Hits you in the feels every time, you really can't take a joke, can you? The irony of me posting Baby Herman seems to have flown right under your head & hit you in the heart. Wrong board for that.
For Greenberg's photos, did the parents get paid for their & their children's time & energy? If so, talk to them about your concerns. If not, talk to them about your concerns. And, talk to Greenberg some more about your concerns, Until then, meme material is meme material here. As a so-called mulatto, lots of things here today (well, every day) would offend me if I didn't ignore them. I choose not to feed them more energy. So, thanks for feeding me the energy.
One more…liberal Slate is certainly not going to convince me to feel like you do.
Wrong question. Real question is are you being productive while Q is quiet?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0uCrA7ePno
1996: Hillary Clinton on "superpredators" (C-SPAN)
only 298,264 views, sad!
Jarrett was born in Shiraz, Iran during the Pahlavi dynasty, to American parents James E. Bowman and Barbara Taylor Bowman. One of her maternal great-grandfathers, Robert Robinson Taylor, was an architect who was the first accredited African American architect, and the first African American student enrolled at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
>>1578172 = SJW
Again, did the parents get paid, or not? Talk to the parents, if you're really so concerned. You're wasting time talking to me about your social justice issue.
Very much so, just a little more PC
I asked YOU for sauce on paid parents. Nice reversal though.
Look, I understand how you feel re: this photos and the uproar they caused. I accept your information and will look into it further. I however, will not be told that I'm aiding in the exploitation of children because I used a picture of a child crying that you don't like. Blame the autism, yet I can't feel what you're feeling about it. Logic will work on me, not an outburst. Accept that, monitor your approach (read: sound less like a triggered snowflake), and maybe, just maybe, you can get me to agree with you. With facts. So again I ask you,
For Greenberg's photos, did the parents get paid for their & their children's time & energy?
from the article linked:
But criticism of her series, “End Times,” hasn’t focused on Greenberg’s political views. Instead, it has focused on the crying faces in the photographs, prompting accusations that Greenberg abused the children to get them to show emotion.
Accusations. Have they been proven true?
from the article linked:
But criticism of her series, “End Times,” hasn’t focused on Greenberg’s political views. Instead, it has focused on the crying faces in the photographs, prompting accusations that Greenberg abused the children to get them to show emotion.
Accusations. Have they been proven true?
Not my meme, found it here, used it here. Wanna take a round with everyone who's used it?
And while you're at it, how many people used in memes today have not given their informed consent? Yet, it happens. Are you going to go after everyone who uses anyone in a meme who does not give their informed consent to be used in a meme? Be fair.