>>1577888

Cartoons are fake. We all know they are fake. Is there any way to determine that these real photos by Greenberg were produced organically?

As a professional photographer, I know these photo sessions were 'set-up' to elicit the reactions caught on film. Just think about capturing the photos; how do you get a toddler/baby to hold still enough to snap a pic? How difficult would it be to grab that photo while a child is traumatized/crying?

We never see the bottom portion of these photos- wonder why. Is there a set of pliers squeezing their tiny toes? Is someone performing an act below the lens?

A cartoon is inanimate. A cartoon depicts a natural state. Not even close to what Greenberg produces. It is NOT art.

>>1577813

>>1578044

YOU are feeding the beast. DOES NOT MATTER wtf your skin looks like. This IS NOT about skin, it's about babies being tortured you ass-clown.

Every time you use these photos you promote the exact ideals we are FIGHTING here. Don't tell me this isn't what this board is for; IT IS EXACTLY WHAT 8 CH IS ABOUT!

We locate the Cretans of society and post them so others can take notice and adjust their behaviors to 'UN-like' the things they thought were ok in the past. When people learn that Netflix is on the wrong side, they boycott because what the company is doing is wrong. Likewise, posting these pictures is WRONG.

Simply pointing it out and you proved that YOU are the one that does not belong here by promoting EXPLOITED CHILDREN.

YOU are ONE OF (((THEM))).

Look Anons- this Anon LIKES exploiting children! Actually defending it!

>>1578221

Sauce on paid parents?

No- you can't prove anyone was paid.

You can't even prove these babies have parents!

I believe these are parent-less kids… you know, the ones we are defending, the ones we are attempting to bring justice for?

No parent would promote this. No parent would put their child in this position of utter unhappiness purposely and then exploit it for money. Doing so makes that parent unfit. An orphanage would allow it for money. A child trafficker would do it for money. PODESTA's do it all the time for money.

And so would a GRENBERG.

You are on the wrong side of this arguement.

I have provided ample examples of why this is not art, why this is NOT ok. Yet you persist in suporting why you believe CHILD EXPLOITATION IS OK.

You proved where you stand. You CHOSE to stand in that pile of shit you created. We all make choices; simply pointing that out for all to see.

It isn't about social justice fuktard.

IT'S ABOUT EXPLOITING CHILDREN.

You exploit children and are defending it!

Sick.

>>1578392

ThanQ Anon.

Greenberg's photos are sick and part of the cabals exploitation of We the People. Her work glorifies the suffering of babies.

I am glad others take notice.

Normalizing babies in pain is just another 'baby-step' in their normalizing child sex.

>>1578484

You're the one posting it. It is up to YOU to verify and you can't!

Since you shared your skin color (which has nothing to do with this debate), let me share with you; I've been here since day 1. I have a Masters degree in psychology. I'm a professional photographer. I seriously doubt you could find anyone more qualified to speak to this topic.

YOU are on the wrong side of this and you don't even attempt to hide your support of it. These pictures appear every so often here and up until today, I looked past them. Today was the day I put my foot down. And you did nothing to see that YOU are exploiting children. Just look at the damn picture! You derive value from a crying child? 'Normal' people see it and KNOW the child is in pain.

Hope you noticed that another Anon has spoken and they are actively filtering you now. I'm sure other Anons are as well, they just haven't posted it. #METOO.

When you find the parents of these children, please post their info.

Buh-bye shill exploiter of babies.