Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 11:45 a.m. No.1578080   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8117 >>8216

>>1578042

Problem is that most people don't know the difference between a Scientific Theory and a laymans theory.

 

We can all theorize, that's called guessing based on beliefs.

But for it to be a scientific theory, you need peer reviewed papaers and for other people to verify your theory.

 

Religious people especially loves this.

"Oh so it's just a theory? So you admit that you don't know?"

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 11:51 a.m. No.1578143   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8185

>>1578117

Are you really this stupid?

That is what makes the difference between a scientific theory… It is proven facts…

 

>Putting 'scientific' in front of it does not make it any less a theory.

This shows your ignorance. You don't just put "scientific" in front of it.

It being "scientific" is a property of the theory, not a label

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 11:53 a.m. No.1578181   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1578150

>Have you considered that it might be a slide the good guys wanted?

Yes. And as you conclude it is not.

 

>Dow is off nearly 500 points, something is going on in the background.

My point exactly.

The Roseanne thing is a slide, bigger stuff is happening.

Thanks for proving my point.

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 11:56 a.m. No.1578214   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8245

>>1578185

>What's so hard to understand?

How you became this ignorant.

 

>language manipulation.

Funny you bring this up. Because that is exactly what you are doing by conflating everyday speech with academic terms.

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 12:01 p.m. No.1578267   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8368

>>1578216

Nice try shill.

I'm not arguing Evolution at all.

It's not my expertise…

What i'm arguing is that you people are trying to manipulate us by conflating terms.*

I'm not hiding anywhere, behind anything.

I accept the facts as they come. I don't just believe what anyone tells me, i verify for myself.

You should try it sometime instead of just believing your holy book.

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 12:03 p.m. No.1578281   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1578245

No i'm not a scientist.

I am just able to read and discern.

You can too, it just requires you to accept that your holy book is not infallible.

 

It's quite funny that my last remark resembles your accusations of me so much…

Think of that what you will.

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 12:16 p.m. No.1578420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8518

>>1578368

Okay. I get it now.

We are both projecting our black and white views unto one and other.

I'm no accolade of science, in any way.

And i completely agree that especially modern science is more belief than facts.

But i still agree with the scientific method and i understand, like you say you do, the difference between writing an academic paper and talking to normal people about ideas.

The problem today, also within science, is people confusing the terms.

Anonymous ID: f3e6b6 May 29, 2018, 12:32 p.m. No.1578574   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1578555

I take that as confirmation that i hit a nerve and you don't have the brain capacity to make a counter argument.

Cry moar ! Please ! It sustains me