>maybe there's a way I could send him an email, from a different address than I normally use…
Maybe just the fact the BO of Q research would ask anons to email them should be a red flag. Q research BO should be promoting opsec for anons, not putting them at risk. But you know that, cunt.
The baker/bv refused to handoff a bake after offering to anon because the baker/bv "didn't know the anon" then they asked the baker to go to the meta and starting asking who they were and shit, then the board owner claimed it was OSS, OSS proved it wasn't them and then the board owner came here, lied about it, and locked the bread
>The baker/bv refused to handoff
Baker BV also just admitted it in the new meta anons made.
>>15786577
>I went back and checked the ID through 10 previous breads. That's how I I've drawn my current conclusion.
Which was another thing the board owner was caught lying about. Called the anon delusional and a liar.
>Why would the BO need a baker to email him?
It's how comms always controlled the bakes. Look at the bottom left corner. so can see them passing around protonmail accounts to contact each other. They work as a team.
>Strange how /halfmind/ only cares about what goes on here, In between their spamming and other attacks that is
Hivemind was literally setup to archive what you delete here, you retarded fuck.