>The thread's overrun again with posts on irrelevant stuff, attacks on 8kun and QR admins,
Irrelevant is an opinion. Concerns weren't an attack at first, but since no one cares to address the concerns, it becomes an attack when you react in yet the same way every time. It isn't an attack to point out something factual and truthful did happen in reality.
>and stupid arguments.
opinion
>There's no real interest in discussion - just attacks and counterattacks.
You're describing your own behavior here. Are you aware you're blaming people for your own lack of real interest in the discussion?
<To be blunt, BO doesn't give a damn about most of the "concerns." They aren't real.
I'm aware that you are deluded. Is every fact denied with a "you're not real, point/counterpoint"? What about facts which are verifiable? Jaden smith calling for your counterpoint.
>Admin focus is to provide a place where anons can work.
META thread is about META issues of the board which is relevant. I keep mostly out of general because DESPITE your attempts to suggest "that'd be a better place" clearly you wouldn't want me to interfere with a non-related work space. Imagine if I did, though. Do you think you would be happy with me if I transferred over? I think not.
>A free speech board where anons can post digs, memes and prayers in a effort to defeat the enemies of freedom and defend the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY. But I won't CENSOR YOU IN THE NAME OF IT.
>None of us pay a DIME for this board, we're lucky to have it. We're especially lucky to have graphics, which could have easily disappeared for good in Aug 2021. This board itself can disappear at any time. Suggest you use it while you've got it.
I do not need to give up my morals just because someone stole a board and gives access to use it for free. It's a nice thing to do, don't get me wrong, but it doesn't erase history, especially considering that pattern of behavior has not ceased. I know you're okay with it, because you don't care. I hope you lose interest before you feel the knife watkins, because those are the only two scenarios I see in your future. Real talk.
If only staff cared about the concerns of us peons.
I am of the opinion that it's what they say repeatedly that rules their thoughts. Therefore, it is not the content of one's posts. You could give them absolutely good advice, but because they have reacted in an identitarian manner they will malign, and refuse to listen no matter how good your ideas are. They will oppose someone just because they have reductionist thoughts and you see it repeatedly.
So I think anyone not a part of their verified email discussion chain gets shut down, prevented from baking, posts deleted, everything in the name of their character assessment where one is guilty by association purely. Let's not forget that this would work both ways, however, if you were to be illogical. Shut 'the shutting down' down, because when it comes to morality, there have been so many times where opportunities presented themselves in the META thread, and never once did anyone attempt to respond, attempt to be honest about things, attempt to get concerns moved higher in the chain which absolutely exists no matter how much disdain and gaslight is pumped, or answers to questions given. BO said 'in a perfect world' I might be given answers, but my question is what's preventing BO from even trying, ever? Heirarchy?
The real reason why.
CONFIRMED.
"Stand up to be counted!" doesn't work when you can't count in the first place.
sauce for the claim that TS had nothing, because this sauce shows something.
Because that's how it appears on TS. He retruthed a post, that post is in a post chain. It won't show the chain when looking at his retruth. The point is the post IS retruthed by Trump and the post IS simultaneously with a ton of Q-drops. It's undeniable.
It's just like "Who will ask Trump the Q?" regarding corrupt journalists, all over again. But now clowns are in the QR regime.
You're changing the wording of your explanation, and then changing rthe wording of referring to the event.
But you know you're doing that, aren't you. Why don't you log on TS yourself so you don't have to rely on anon to tell you what happened when POTUST retruthed a post IN A CHAIN below qdropping accounts. WHY WOULD YOU HIDE THIS FACT FROM VIEW? You should be PROUD that POTUS saw qdrops!
Just be clear. It takes humility to put forward the notion that those qdrops came from your board, and you don't want to seem like a lesser than for god knows what reason, that you're willing to lie even in your refusals to accurately portray what happened. But why? why lie about it and then cover up the lie and not tell the truth describing it as just DJT @ TS? Wouldn't you be excited thatPOTUS saw content that came from your board!?
>Is the board your red headed stepchild?
So you claim this evidence is fake?
Say it. For once I want you to explicitly tell me this is faked right here.
A reminder of what 'it" is, since I just KNOW you have forgotten conveniently. "POTUS retruthed a post IN A CHAIN below qdropping accounts. WHY WOULD YOU HIDE THIS FACT FROM VIEW? You should be PROUD that POTUS saw qdrops!"
BV-edit: file removed because self-doxx (and self-reported)
Tell me the evidence is faked according to the fact you claim didn't happen. SAY IT. Because if you refuse, then you're failing to read and spuriously claiming 'it didn't happen' or you're fully committing to the lie.
It being "POTUS retruthed a post IN A CHAIN below qdropping accounts. WHY WOULD YOU HIDE THIS FACT FROM VIEW? You should be PROUD that POTUS saw qdrops!"
Too bad you're moving goal posts. Tell me the evidence is faked or true. WHY is the evidence explanation so difficult to say for you? The assertion that I put forward DOES NOT LIE about the evidence. I don't care WHAT you say it ISN'T because I never lied about the evidence. I SIMPLY WENT ON TS. I have ONLY EVER went on TS. The aggregator is IRRELEVANT TO ME. So when you bring it up to me you're specifically bringing bullshit into the discussion but you knew that you were.
Glowiejuice?
bump
bamp
boop
Do you realize META was locked several times?