>>1867186

Had been away – trying to catch up. Getting desperate about how hard it is when you miss just a couple of days, let alone being away for longer …. lol

Have checked some of the examples – there's clearly sth not right with the 5/25 & the 8 posts ….

5/25 was during the 11 day hiatus – if I didn't miss anything (very seriously) then my count is 0 posts on 5/25.

Created a "blank" (not sure if anyone wanna use it as such) which also contains the number of Q posts (in EST) for each day – should be easier to check for a quick estimate at least (even though Q's own references/mentions are not counted). For example, days like 04/06 with 28 posts would not easily work for an analysis of some "#qposts:#tweets:time" pattern assuming qposts stands for hours (i.e. "HH:") ….

The simple beauty of >>1889265 made me draw the spiral until 11/22 again although I'm as of yet still assuming 11/11 (possibly +2 days/chapters) is somehow a final date.

Oh, and a note on tweets: It's a bitch collecting these and getting an accurate count … Yes, I use trumptwitterarchive, but it doesn't have a good count on @POTUS tweets. Will never use twatter (or anything like that) myself. So maybe it's my fault, but I'd surely appreciate a reliable and homogeneous (in timestamps/timezone) "database" of tweets esp. for potus account.

Lol, and no "spreadsheets" for me, sorry – when I hear spreadsheet I rather think of something dirty (and that may also incl. Mr. Gates' products)

>>1893789

Should be more complete with #Q posts & #Trump tweets – so here's a trial version of it.

With the colored circles being days when Q posted, it should be clear which number is which. Times are EST as before, number of tweets are only those from @realdonaldtrump taken from the CSV of the trumptwitterarchive.

Please use it as a primer only, when trying to figure out the #posts:#tweets:time pattern – I have not checked for completeness of the data at trumptwitterarchive.com, and assume @potus tweets would count as well.

>>1893852

>>1893683

(and all others) – God bless you all too, fellow Clockfags & Anons! Even if we're few …. I agree that anons will soon come & ask us to explain it to them. No fame wanted, always happy to help. And I, for one, wouldn't have drawn the clock w/o the smart & persistent anon a while back ….

So much love to y'all – and now enough with the ass kissing (no homo) … lol !

>>1897824

Whoever you are – please do not make these endorsements here –try do that in the General, anons will probably rip you apart !

I'll report this post and want it removed !

Reason: Evilwulf is a motherfucker stealing shit from everywhere (i.e. QClock & qanon.pub @ github), and now he has an exe+dll package with who knows what's in there published on a third party website !

The dumb faggot steals from people who publish trustable (incl. sources to be sure it's virus & bug free) material created through their work, puts his name on it, and now famefags with a shitty name and a shitty webpage …. Fuck him ! Please anyone, be careful with that link and the zip/exe file. I do not want that shit here …. sorry for my impatience about that – the mofo tried it before …. I hope the post will be deleted.

>>1898297

Thanks. No worries please. Not angry at you. But I know how to work with open source material, and so should anyone who uses other people's material, esp. when it comes to the stuff we do here. It is crucial to incl. sources to maintain trust. And so I would probably have been less impatient if the mofo would have published it on here, w/o his silly name and incl. the sources …. but he didn't ….

Just got up and am only now having a covfefe. Probably that played a role too …. lol.

>>1902824

I agree that seconds is hard to time accurately (as necessary for any consistent & reliable cryptographic scheme) – that is, unless you have some kind of direct access to the servers (which would introduce a whole new level of Q's involvement …., and which I still don't believe is likely).

However, what was remarkable, when going over examples in >>1867186 , was that #qposts somehow often worked (or wasn't too far off)

However, a pattern like "#posts:#tweets:time", could also mean something like "DD:HH:MM" or the ":" could, intead of a time-symbol, also be some math operator, like division, modulo etc … still thinking, and like you said, while I keep the possibility of seconds in mind, currently I'm also rather tending towards not taking seconds into account.

Thanks for all your posts/collections! Did I read correctly that you posted 25th & 26th July already in one of the last breads, or was I just having covfefe withdrawl?

>>1903223

Thanks! I'm all fine with mistakes all the time – even more so, when they are corrected (and, for example, one does not start gathering friends, to "vouch" that the mistakes were never there … LOL)

>>1912196

Why do you even come here? What do you want? You don't know anything about the chans or anon-culture, and still you write about 200 words – what for? Ever thought about lurking more before posting?

On June, 8th 21:10:58 (EDT) someone came here namefagging, bragging with some mathematical symbols about his dumbass webpage. He was told to read the 2nd post on QR and fuck off — well it seems he didn't.

Evilwulf? "Good vs. evil" – anyone? Do you even think? And then you smack this bad name on a piece of work, you didn't even produce? On a third-party webpage?

You want to help … by stealing and putting your name on it, publishing some compiled shit for BillGatesFanVictims, that nobody can ever check, re-compile for his own platform or modify for his own use?

Your programming skills not even enough to be able to reproduce the clock w/o having to steal it from here? So what's next, you'll come here regularly for the updated blanks, right?

If it means anything to you, and for what it's worth: I do not want "Evilwulf" to use the Q-Clock! Got it? Probably you don't care, just as you don't seem to care about being an anon, researching or even lurking with us, establishing trust or doing your work here, instead of famefagging somewhere else. Still you use the word "honestly" twice ….

Poster [761f47] uses WWG1WGA quite abundantly – it wears out, you know, esp. when using it so inflationary and for every little fuckup that happens (and should not). And the anon is clearly not speaking for me in this case!

>>1911287

If I remember correctly, the anon might be away from the board for a couple of days, so he posted clocks/posts in advance for us to be able to post them in the General regularly.

If you check further above, he produced/posted pics for all end of June & beginning of July.

>>1913896

Was from "notQ" back in #2108. Solver had been referenced above in >>1691585

This is getting confusing – well, if not confusing, then convoluted at least … Have a collection of notQ posts, looks like I missed his last appearance in bread #2128. But will review the solver once more. Also, looks like we (or I) have a bug in the electrical system (pic) … lol.

All the best wishes regarding your health, Anon!

>>1913471

As I see it, there is no way of searching such large piece of data (as 1600 Q posts) online and in a browser for patterns.

Not sure how familiar you are with tools as "grep" (on Windows, install e.g. cygwin, on Mac/Linux use the console) – and you would have to have a reliable, complete & local copy of Q posts. I am using the three timezones HTML, and it's really easy to find any kind of timestamp, pattern or words. Let me know in case you're not aware and need more info.

I am very much wondering, why anons rely on an online resource (as e.g. qanon.pub) so much, when "archive offline" has been mentioned time & again …. For clockwork, and for me, qanon.pub doesn't work (and I have found at least two errors in timestamps there).