Anonymous ID: 0d6a60 March 5, 2022, 6:47 p.m. No.15794220   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4256

>>15794205

kek - You've been quite the chatty Kathy this bread. You seem to have a lot of opinions yet you don't like it when others have one.

 

My assertions stand. There was fakenews in the last set of notes. You asked. Now you know.

Anonymous ID: 0d6a60 March 5, 2022, 6:58 p.m. No.15794317   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4328 >>4373

>>15794256

BTW - It is your job to keep the fakenews out of the notables. If you cannot verify that it's real it doesn't belong in the notables. If you can't vet the source it doesn't belong in the notables. If the news is fake we don't use it.

 

We are the news now.

Anonymous ID: 0d6a60 March 5, 2022, 7:01 p.m. No.15794339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4355

>>15794328

And your point is? Do you know that Q Research virtually ended the US involvement in the Ukraine Military Operation by debunking the fakenews? Do you realize what our mission is? Do you know we're destroying the lies of the fakenews and replacing it with truth dug out by citizen journos?

Anonymous ID: 0d6a60 March 5, 2022, 7:06 p.m. No.15794371   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15794355

Not going to argue about that night. What I'm saying is that the less than honest shills are bombarding the board with fakenews and trying to get it in the notables to get aggregated out to shape the narrative they want. That's where the baker / notetaker filter for the fakenews is crucial. Sometimes fakenews can be used to illuminate their fake narratives, but only when the consumer of the notables KNOWS it's a fakenews narrative.