Bless you.
>>15793950 lb
>>15793783 lb
evolution theory says that elements such as nitrogen, carbon, oxigen have just happened to be mixed together in the primordial soup into
this - pic related
and then this just happened to have mixed into
this - pic related
over millions of years so later single cell organisms could evolve into more complex life.
well, evolution theory was made way before the complexity of cells (also the very first ones) was even known.
from todays point of view, it does not work. it just cannot have evolved that way.
a cell is a very complex thing and is only able to function, to survive and to replicate with all the different components of a cell.
without a tiny powerplan, cells could not survive.
without tiny transport vehicles for the power plant, cells cound not survive.
without a protective shell, cells could not survive.
without dna, cells could not exist or replicate.
and all of those components just cannot just have evolved on their own and later just happened to be mixed together into the first cells.
impossible.
tiny powerplants alone can not exist.
neither can all the other components of a cell.
so there is a huge gap in explanation how the first cells "evolved". science cannot explain it.
and that is not even mentioning the fact that with all the fossils found, there is not a single one found that would actually show the intermediate state between two species. and that is really quite odd, as obviously when species A would evolve into species B over millions of years, there would have been many intermediate AB animals that should be visible as fossils.
well, not a single fossil worldwide is found that shows this kind of intermediate state.
and also it´s leaving aside the fact that many people with expertise in certain fields just cannot explain to themselves or others how complex organs as e.g. the eyes have evolved.
so it was not evolution.
who was it?
and no, evolution is simply not possible. can not explain how the first cells even evolved, and with that obviouly not any life.
please explain.
bc there are no intermediate states found, two kind of fossils were claimed to be intermediate, but they were actually not.
species A - fossils found
i
n
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
-
no fossils found even though this period is way longer than species A and B existing (as they would evolve all the time)
s
t
a
t
e
species B - fossils found
seems a lot like it has always been A and B and there never was an intermediate state.
but when looking at a cell, evolution theory is bs anyway obviously.
I have no time to read now. But please explain what that actually means briefly.
>He argues that the gradually changed intermediate species do not exists so much as the abruptly changed species.
it´s not evolution theory - so the slowly and graduatelly evolving of species and them turning into other species by gene mutations (try) and extinction (error) - if it´s
>abruptly changed.
and the complexity of a cell alone just cannot be explained by evolution theory.
a complex cell with many different required functional units who are not able to live without a cell and all the other units cannot just happen to be mixed together, bc those single functional units could not have lived or reproduced.