>>15799150 lb

repost from lb.

>>15793950 lb

>>15793783 lb

evolution theory says that elements such as nitrogen, carbon, oxigen have just happened to be mixed together in the primordial soup into

this - pic related

and then this just happened to have mixed into

this - pic related

over millions of years so later single cell organisms could evolve into more complex life.

well, evolution theory was made way before the complexity of cells (also the very first ones) was even known.

from todays point of view, it does not work. it just cannot have evolved that way.

a cell is a very complex thing and is only able to function, to survive and to replicate with all the different components of a cell.

without a tiny powerplan, cells could not survive.

without tiny transport vehicles for the power plant, cells cound not survive.

without a protective shell, cells could not survive.

without dna, cells could not exist or replicate.

and all of those components just cannot just have evolved on their own and later just happened to be mixed together into the first cells.

impossible.

tiny powerplants alone can not exist.

neither can all the other components of a cell.

so there is a huge gap in explanation how the first cells "evolved". science cannot explain it.

and that is not even mentioning the fact that with all the fossils found, there is not a single one found that would actually show the intermediate state between two species. and that is really quite odd, as obviously when species A would evolve into species B over millions of years, there would have been many intermediate AB animals that should be visible as fossils.

well, not a single fossil worldwide is found that shows this kind of intermediate state.

and also it´s leaving aside the fact that many people with expertise in certain fields just cannot explain to themselves or others how complex organs as e.g. the eyes have evolved.

so it was not evolution.

who was it?

>>15799606

>>15799218 lb

maybe you did not see the double bonding?

>>15799231 lb - yup. you are right.

or maybe you are confused how carbon can have 6 bonds when having 6 electrons but only 4 in outer shell?

chemistry in school is some time back, but I guess carbon gives his four electrons in outer shell to those bonds:

• nitrogen

• hidrogen

• hidroxy group

• rest

oxigen gives his four outer electrons to the double bonding.

but dunno for sure, not a chemist.

anyway, just took a pic from google to make a point. that point being, amino acids are complext and it´s rather unlikely they just happened to got mixed together py pure coincidence of evolution theory.

and it´s just impossible that those amino acids formed the different needed components of a cell and way later were mixed together into a cell by coincidence. bc all of those components can not live without all the other stuff in a cell, e.g. a shell, a power plant, dna and so on.

also, just saying

>everything else you wrote is total bs

is not exactly a great argument.

>>15799234 lb

pic does not show atp. so dunno what you refer to. maybe go look up what that even means

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenosine_triphosphate

>>15799615

>and it´s just impossible that those amino acids formed the different needed components of a cell and way later were mixed together into a cell by coincidence. bc all of those components can not live without all the other stuff in a cell, e.g. a shell, a power plant, dna and so on.

this is like science claiming that humans evolved like this:

• first some legs became legs

• then some arms became arms

• some torsos became torsos

• then some heads became heads by evolution

• all those body parts just "lived" for millions of years and then, by pure coincidence they "formed" a human body and this was then the evolutionary outcome.

the thing with cells having just evolved by their components evolving and being mixed together by coindidence is just as ridiculous.

so evolution theory obviously is bs.

well. what does that mean?

>>15799693

I am the poster that posted the posts that fit my ID and I am the one posting it lb.

an anon said the thing on atp. and I did not get it bc there is no atp shown in the pics. this is some kind of cell fuel. so remotely related to the topic. but a post that just does not make any sense.

please explain what you refer to if I did not get it.

>>15799735

If you refer to me being the light, Jesus, then yes, I am. But right now just wanted to post this.

The whole world sees me anyway.

And I will just ignore if you tried to give me, the holy and perfect one, any kind of advice.

Much love and blessing, anon.

You are free already!