https://rumble.com/vucxi4-exclusive-interview-with-donald-j.-trump-kashs-corner.html
Exclusive Interview with Donald J. Trump - Kash’s Corner
Nation News Generation Published February 8, 2022 347 Views
https://rumble.com/vucxi4-exclusive-interview-with-donald-j.-trump-kashs-corner.html
Exclusive Interview with Donald J. Trump - Kash’s Corner
Nation News Generation Published February 8, 2022 347 Views
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202100663/pdf/DCPD-202100663.pdf
Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021
Remarks on the Situation in Afghanistan
August 16, 2021
Good afternoon.
I want to speak today to the unfolding situation in Afghanistan the developments that have
taken place in the last week and the steps we're taking to address the rapidly evolving events.
My national security team and I have been closely monitoring the situation on the ground in
Afghanistan and moving quickly to execute the plans we had put in place to respond to every
constituency, including—and contingency—including the rapid collapse we're seeing now.
I'll speak more in a moment about the specific steps we're taking, but I want to remind
everyone how we got here and what America's interests are in Afghanistan.
We went to Afghanistan almost 20 years ago with clear goals: get those who attacked us on
September 11, 2001, and make sure Al Qaida could not use Afghanistan as a base from which to
attack us again. We did that. We severely degraded Al Qaida in Afghanistan. We never gave up
the hunt for Usama bin Laden, and we got him. That was a decade ago.
Our mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation building. It was never
supposed to be creating a unified, centralized democracy. Our only vital national interest in
Afghanistan remains today what it has always been: preventing and—a terrorist attack on
American homeland.
I've argued for many years that our mission should be narrowly focused on counterterrorism,
not counterinsurgency or nation building. That's why I opposed the surge when it was proposed in
2009 when I was Vice President.
And that's why, as President, I am adamant that we focus on the threats we face today in
2021, not yesterday's threats. Today, the terrorist threat has metastasized well beyond
Afghanistan: al-Shabaab in Somalia, Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, al-Nusra in Syria, ISIS
attempting to create a caliphate in Syria and Iraq and establishing affiliates in multiple countries
in Africa and Asia. These threats warrant our attention and our resources.
We conduct effective counterterrorism missions against terrorist groups in multiple countries
where we don't have permanent military presence. If necessary, we'll do the same in Afghanistan.
We've developed counterterrorism over-the-horizon capability that will allow us to keep our eyes
firmly fixed on any direct threats to the United States in the region and to act quickly and
decisively if needed.
When I came into office, I inherited a deal that President Trump negotiated with the Taliban.
Under his agreement, U.S. forces would be out of Afghanistan by May 1, 2021, just a little over 3
months after I took office.
U.S. forces had already drawn down during the Trump administration from roughly 15,500
American forces to 2,500 troops in country, and the Taliban was at its strongest militarily since
The choice I had to make, as your President, was either to follow through on that agreement
or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban in the middle of the spring fighting season.
There would have been no cease-fire after May 1. There was no agreement protecting our
forces after May 1. There was no status quo of stability without American casualties after May 1. ..
.. There was only the cold reality of either following through on the agreement to withdraw our
forces or escalating the conflict and sending thousands more American troops back into combat in
Afghanistan, lurching into the third decade of conflict.
I stand squarely behind my decision. After 20 years, I've learned the hard way that there was
never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces. That's why we were still there. We were clear eyed
about the risks. We planned for every contingency.
But I always promised the American people that I will be straight with you. The truth is:
This did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated.
So what's happened? Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country. The Afghan
military collapsed, sometimes without trying to fight. If anything, the developments of the past
week reinforced that ending U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan now was the right decision.
American troops cannot and should not be fighting in a war and dying in a war that Afghan
forces are not willing to fight for themselves. We spent over a trillion dollars. We trained and
equipped an Afghan military force of some 300,000 strong, incredibly well equipped, a force
larger in size than the militaries of many of our NATO allies.
And we gave them every tool they could need. We paid their salaries, provided for the
maintenance of their air force, something the Taliban doesn't have. Taliban does not have an air
force. We've provided close air support. We gave them every chance to determine their own
future. What we could not provide them was the will to fight for that future.
There's some very brave and capable Afghan special forces units and soldiers, but if
Afghanistan is unable to mount any real resistance to the Taliban now, there is no chance that 1
year—1 more year, 5 more years, or 20 more years—of U.S. military boots on the ground would
have made any difference.
And here's what I believe to my core: It is wrong to order American troops to step up when
Afghanistan's own armed forces would not. If the political leaders of Afghanistan were unable to
come together for the good of their people, unable to negotiate for the future of their country
when the chips were down, they would never have done so while U.S. troops remained in
Afghanistan bearing the brunt of the fighting for them.
And our true strategic competitors—China and Russia—would love nothing more than the
United States to continue to funnel billions of dollars in resources and attention into stabilizing
Afghanistan indefinitely.
When I hosted President Ghani and Chairman Abdullah at the White House in June and
again when I spoke by phone to Ghani in July, we had very frank conversations. We talked about
how Afghanistan should prepare to fight their civil wars after the U.S. military departed, to clean
up the corruption in government so the government could function for the Afghan people. We
talked extensively about the need for Afghan leaders to unite politically. They failed to do any of
that.
I also urged them to engage in diplomacy, to seek a political settlement with the Taliban.
This advice was flatly refused. Mr. Ghani insisted the Afghan forces would fight, but obviously,
he was wrong.
So I am left again to ask of those who argue that we should stay: How many more
generations of America's daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghans—
Afghanistan's civil war when Afghan troops will not? How many more lives—American lives—
is it worth? How many endless rows of headstones at Arlington National Cemetery? ..
.. 3
I'm clear on my answer: I will not repeat the mistakes we've made in the past: the mistake of
staying and fighting indefinitely in a conflict that is not in the national interest of the United
States, of doubling down on a civil war in a foreign country, of attempting to remake a country
through the endless military deployments of U.S. forces. Those are the mistakes we cannot
continue to repeat, because we have significant vital interests in the world that we cannot afford
to ignore.
I also want to acknowledge how painful this is to so many of us. The scenes we're seeing in
Afghanistan, they're gut-wrenching, particularly for our veterans, our diplomats, humanitarian
workers, for anyone who has spent time on the ground working to support the Afghan people.
For those who have lost loved ones in Afghanistan and for Americans who have fought and
served in the country—serve our country in Afghanistan—this is deeply, deeply personal.
It is for me as well. I've worked on these issues as long as anyone. I've been throughout
Afghanistan during this war—while the war was going on—from Kabul to Kandahar to the Kunar
Valley. I've traveled there on four different occasions. I met with the people. I've spoken to the
leaders. I spent time with our troops. And I came to understand firsthand what was and was not
possible in Afghanistan.
So now we're focused on what is possible. We will continue to support the Afghan people.
We will lead with our diplomacy, our international influence, and our humanitarian aid. We'll
continue to push for regional diplomacy and engagement to prevent violence and instability.
We'll continue to speak out for the basic rights of the Afghan people—of women and girls—just
as we speak out all over the world.
I have been clear that human rights must be the center of our foreign policy, not the
periphery. But the way to do it is not through endless military deployments, it's with our
diplomacy, our economic tools, and rallying the world to join us.
Now, let me lay out the current mission in Afghanistan. I was asked to authorize—and I
did—6,000 U.S. troops to deploy to Afghanistan for the purpose of assisting in the departure of
U.S. and allied civilian personnel from Afghanistan and to evacuate our Afghan allies and
vulnerable Afghans to safety outside of Afghanistan.
Our troops are working to secure the airfield and to ensure continued operation of both the
civilian and military flights. We're taking over air traffic control. We have safely shut down our
Embassy and transferred our diplomats. Our diplomatic presence is now consolidated at the
airport as well.
Over the coming days, we intend to transport out thousands of American citizens who have
been living and working in Afghanistan. We'll also continue to support the safe departure of
civilian personnel—the civilian personnel of our allies—who are still serving in Afghanistan.
Operation Allies Refugee [Refuge],* which I announced back in July, has already moved
2,000 Afghans who are eligible for special immigration visas and their families to the United
States. In the coming days, the U.S. military will provide assistance to move more SIV-eligible
Afghans and their families out of Afghanistan.
We're also expanding refugee access to cover other vulnerable Afghans who worked for our
Embassy: U.S. nongovernmental agencies—or the U.S. nongovernmental organizations; and
Afghans who otherwise are at great risk; and U.S. news agencies.
I know that there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating Afghans—civilians
sooner. Part of the answer is, some of the Afghans did not want to leave earlier, still hopeful for ..
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-1999-06-29/pdf/CREC-1999-06-29-pt1-PgE1420-3.pdf
counter re Venezuela oil
SHOW socialism and Venez.
what you SHOW now People will member later
when the news talks about Venez oil People will member what you SHOWed/told them
7/16/2021
'imo
silver/gold (large bet)
crude oil (large bet)
crypto variety (small bet)
buy the dips of most stocks until the fed does something dif than buy the debt imo
they will announce b4 hand imo; they are stupid haha
hold this position until the fed makes a dif move (think years)
(when Trump gets in be prepared to change strategies / sell)
the situation shows the fed is corrupt 'buying the debt' creating inflation seemingly knowingly
fire janet yellen
'On January 26, 2021, Janet Yellen was sworn in as the 78th Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. An economist by training, she took office after almost fifty years in academia and public service. She is the first person in American history to have led the White House Council of Economic Advisors, the Federal Reserve, and the Treasury Department. '
https://home.treasury.gov/about/general-information/officials/janet-yellen
'“We will have several more months of rapid inflation,” Yellen told Sara Eisen during a “Closing Bell” interview. “So I’m not saying that this is a one-month phenomenon. But I think over the medium term, we’ll see inflation decline back toward normal levels. But, of course, we have to keep a careful eye on it.” The consumer price index, which measures costs for a wide range of items, increased 5.4% in June, the fastest pace in nearly 13 years. Excluding food and energy, the gauge rose 4.5%, the fastest acceleration in nearly 30 years. Prices that goods and services producers receive for their products jumped 7.3%, a record for data going back to 2010.'
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/15/yellen-sees-several-more-months-of-rapid-inflation-worries-about-impact-on-home-buyers.html
imo'