Cool. Made mine in Feb 2020.
Yours is better. Stolen.
>Tucker: He was actually telling the truth on Ukraine
>Tucker: We are at war with Russia
Which is it?
Gotta admit, that was pretty good, on target.
I lost trust in Fox and Tucker after the election. The "we must accept the election results" bullshit was hard to stomach. Then things like this video today make me think he ain't all bad.
Fox is garbage in general. All the news is corrupt, even OAN is beating the propaganda war drums.
>"geeze I fucking hope that's true".
I'm on that team. I Need proof of intent, not proof of links between Q and Trump.
I used to be more excited about the plan, and trusted Trump, until the warp speed death shot etc. (not going to ramble on that one anymore).
At this point I am just watching the world go round and hoping that good things happen with the awareness that it could all be the same team fucking with our heads until they convince everyone to become borg or something.
If it becomes clear that the system DJT outlined in "this will get Trump elected video" and that it is not being replaced with a digital mark of the beast system, then I will begin to trust again.
>US funded bio labs in Ukraine?
Several pdf in notables over the last couple of days taken from US embassy in Ukraine, DoD, and other sources.
A baker yesterday preferred Reuters to George, bout the dumbest thing I have heard in awhile. I think it is good sauce + it has a secondary source listed. Notable imo
>they steal articles from others
That's what we do all day here, it's called sharing information.
And wasn't that his magazine? He's dead now so nobody stole his name.
You must be that baker from last night that thinks Reuters is credible.
>here is the original from JellyFish news
>
>thats sounds like a believable source.
>
>https://jellyfish.news/one-step-closer-to-a-potential-genetic-catastrophe/
>
>or maybe the actual paper
>
>https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
<Who is we?
We is them anons that post links, we steal stories and post them as notables. Like you just demonstrated.
>Reuters is credible
Not anymore.