/bangsheadondesk
It's a possibility.
Would eliminate smog as most towers are near interstates. Would also enable long-distance driving in electric vehicles. Finding ways to economically reduce petrol use is good. It can't come at a detriment to productivity. The biggest hindrances to innovation are loss of money/control. Imagine if there were incentives to innovate and an environment free enough to enable it?
If you controlled a monopoly on energy, where would you spend a significant portion of your R&D dollars? Planning for the future, and figuring out a way to keep control over it for profitability.
UrotsukidĹŤji? If so, everyone's fucked.
No, think White Hats taking over their plans and simply releasing the tech as a matter of "utility provided to the public". The reason energy and the infrastructure costs money is because we (they) decide it costs money. Now imagine white hats take their R&D work and incentivize them to provide it as a public utility? Charging people money to heat their home is criminal. Not incentivizing those that provide the service to do so is also criminal. What's a big brained solution to the problem? What if you could figure out a way to kill the Big Pharma business and free all that money up for actual infrastructure?
To expound on the theory, these infrastructure bills are huge (thousands of pages). The money proposed for them is tremendous. If patriots are in control, and no one (admittedly) is reading through these bills, then what's really in them, and why spend so much money on them? Maybe using the "old guard's" money to pay for humanity improving projects is the big troll from the big man and the plan. In other words, spend all their old monopoly money to fix a lot of problems with humanity, and then bankrupt fiat in exchange for Gold/Silv.
Again, just a theory.
>Churches are supposed to step
That's not how that works, anon. That's not how that ever worked.