Fake news first said it was a conspiracy theory the labs even existed.
Now fake news admits they exist, which means they admit they are either pushing what they themselves called a conspiracy theory, or they lied and their label was a false smear.
Enemy of the People, protecting those who control bioweapons labs.
Nooses ready?
The ordering of proving Q can't depend on when the owner of the Q account decides to post according to some prior date.
No no, in order to prove this account is Q, there will need to be repeat instances of Q posting first and THEN a timed delta from Q+ or Scavino.
There has to be an independent confirmation.
>>we have multiple proofs
Where?
All I see are logical fallacies of inference.
BURDEN IS NOT ON ANYONE TO DiSpRoVe your claim.
None of this is INDEPENDENT verification of Q.
Garbage