Looks like rosacea, a disease driven by chronic inflammation, and common among Irish and other Northern European-descended people.
Canadian Banksters and the WEF crowd in Castreau's cabinet got high on the massive theft of funds they pulled off that Biden's puppetmasters have told him, "OK, the test was successful. Now it's your turn, USA."
We the People need to motivate our representatives to pass a law specifying stiff penalties for lying to the American public. ANY person knowingly lying to the American public, is guilty of a criminal act (perhaps fraud), if that lie was intended to influence the thinking of the public on any major issue. We need such a law, with teeth and enforcement provisions, at the level that it is uniformly applied to corporations as well as individuals. Then we would need to repeal ALL the "hate speech" laws and regulations, because truth is the ultimate defense. If it's true, saying it must NEVER be against the law.
We have a plethora of alphabet agencies whose ostensible purpose is to keep various entities from deceiving the public: the FDA, for food; the SEC, for finance; the Consumer Protection Bureau, and so on. ALL have become "captured" by the industries which they're responsible for regulating. Regulation has been proven to fail, due to regulatory capture. I nevertheless believe that some regulation is needed, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Agency. There need be no "Ministry of Truth," any more than there is currently a "Ministry of Defamation." Defamation is currently an offense which can rise to the level of a crime, if onerous enough; why not widen that to be uniformly applied to ALL deception? How about making it an automatic expulsion from one's taxpayer-funded job if convicted of lying to the public?
Truth is provable; lies are disprovable. To quote John Adams, "Facts are stubborn things."
>the minute you silence the other side…you risk silencing yourself…
Truth withstands examination, whereas lies crumble under scrutiny. FYI, it's a false paradigm to assume there are only two sides to any given question. Having reasoned, civil discourse is the only way our representative republic can properly operate, and for such discussions, we require facts, not deceptions.
To quote John Adams, "Facts are stubborn things."
Go on,…
>enter the ministry of truth
Agree w you on the very small government, as was intended by the Constitution. Disagree on the "Ministry of Truth." Free people act from their own free will; they don't seek permission from their overlords. However, truth will out, and liars who cause harm to society - whether that means they stole an election, lied about polling results, lied about the safety of some product, or perhaps about the actions of our public servants - ANY liars who have caused harm to society must be held accountable for their harm to the republic. A representative republic must have access to the truth in order to function. Many laws have already been passed as purported attempts to bring truth to the public, but few have a broad and uniform application which would give any individual standing to bring charges if the lies which cause harm can be exposed as lies.
Articles in the news today about Q fever, a baterial disease which can linger for years like long-covid, and can be fatal.
>the millions who took it but it was their choice…
DJT assured us all that it was safe and effective, it was "great," and urged us all to go out and get the clot shot jab. Those who admired and blindly trusted DJT did what he said, and many have died. DJT has yet to apologize for the harms he caused by his "Warp Speed" advocacy, nor for his invitation to come protest at the Capitol, only to be set up and imprisoned in third-world conditions without ANY Constitutional protections. I'm aware that Peloser is the architect of the persecutions of the J6 participants, but DJT must have known that such evil plans were in the works.
>How could one even know without getting hypnotized himself?
I think autists are resistant to hypnotism in general. I've observed professional hypnotists performing. They'll say, "watch the pendant" or some such distraction, and anon looks around to see who's watching the pendant, notices the air currents, watches the expression on the hypnotist's face, etc. Then the hypnotist will try to implant a suggestion, such as, "you're very relaxed. You're getting sleepy." Thisanon will think loudly in my head, "no, I'm not. You're lying to me; you have no idea what's going on in my brain." Result: I observe other audience members responding to the hypnotism, but never accept any of the attempted implant suggestions, so not hypnotized.
Speculation: the next attack on the USA will come through Canada, perpetrated by the CCP, and possibly then blamed on Putin. Type of attack: cyber-related, aimed at crashing the banking system. Basis for speculation: past publications by WEF mouthpiece, Jacques Attali (I call him "Attila").
Perhaps Codemonkey is running for office so he will have standing to take issues to court after the election, as in, "how do you (legally) introduce evidence?"