dChan
Anonymous ID: e89d0c March 10, 2022, 10 p.m. No.15835871   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5872 >>6029 >>6286 >>6386 >>6513 >>6610

>>15835816

 

Russia calls U.N. meeting on U.S. "biological activities" – U.S. says "false flag"

 

United Nations – Russia hastily called a Friday morning U.N. Security Council meeting late on Thursday evening to discuss in open debate what it called "the military biological activities of the US on the territory of Ukraine" — leading the Biden administration to immediately denounce it as a "false flag effort."

 

In a comment sent to CBS News, Olivia Dalton, spokesperson for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, said, "We're not going to let Russia gaslight the world or use the UN Security Council as a venue for promoting their disinformation."

 

"Russia has a well-documented history of using chemical weapons and has long maintained a biological weapons program in violation of international law," Dalton said, adding, "Russia also has a track record of falsely accusing the West of the very violations that Russia itself is perpetrating."

 

"This is exactly the kind of false flag effort we have warned Russia might initiate to justify a biological or chemical weapons attack," she said.

 

The Friday meeting was announced by Russia's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Dmitry Polyansky in a tweet linking to the Russian Ministry of Defense, claiming analysis of documents about U.S. "military biological activities" in Ukraine, with a half-dozen documents attached with graphs and charts.

 

Washington had warned earlier this week that Russia could escalate the violence in its war in Ukraine with the use of biological or chemical weapons, or by claiming Ukrainian forces used them as a pretext.

 

White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday dismissed Russia's claims as "preposterous" and suggested Russia may be laying the groundwork for using such weapons itself. "This is all an obvious ploy by Russia to try to try to justify its further premeditated, unprovoked, and unjustified attack on Ukraine."

 

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby also refuted the claims as "absurd" and "classic Russian propaganda."

 

"They're laughable," Kirby said Wednesday. "We are not, not developing biological or chemical weapons inside Ukraine. It's not happening."

 

The Friday meeting will hear briefings from U.N. disarmament chief Izumi Nakamitsu and Under Secretary General Rosemary DiCarlo, a former U.S. Mission to the U.N. Ambassador-rank official.

Anonymous ID: e89d0c March 10, 2022, 10:06 p.m. No.15835896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5911 >>5912 >>5929 >>6029 >>6286 >>6386 >>6513 >>6610

>>15835816

 

Dr. Robert Malone: Ukraine Biolab Watchtower An attempt to triangulate something approximating truth about Ukraine and Biolabs

 

March 11, 2022

 

Great write-up with numerous links:

 

excerpt:

Prior to invasion of Ukraine, the government of Russia signaled that the presence of these DTRA-sponsored “biolabs” in this region was perceived as a threat to Russian national security and biosecurity. Again, if I were a Russian analyst, I would likely conclude that these laboratories represent a threat to national security.

 

Based on information available to me, the US Government does not seem to have made any attempt to assure the government of Russia that these laboratories were performing benign activities. One action which might have mitigated Russian concerns would have been to allow unannounced inspections, much as US and NATO have insisted on in the case of foreign nuclear enrichment or reactor programs.

 

In my professional opinion, based on the language employed by Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, I believe that there is a significant risk that the Russian government has obtained documents or other evidence that (at a minimum) one or more of these laboratories have had biological materials the existence of which is likely to prove embarrassing to the United States. The language used appears to my ear to imply that there are biological materials the existence of which could damage US strategic and tactical geopolitical interests.

 

It is likely that the “chain of custody” or veracity of any evidence which the Russian government may present to support their case will not be clean, and that there will be a strong effort by western media and information sources (social media, tech) to delegitimize any communication by Russia (as a government) and by any persons (Russian or otherwise) who present or attempt to discuss such communication. Including myself. It is highly likely that management of any information concerning this topic is already being globally handled by the Trusted News Initiative organization, and that obtaining or discussing unfiltered and unprocessed “raw” information will soon not be possible.

 

In other words, in my opinion, this is another topic that we will never be able to get to the bottom of, and we will never be able to discern something akin to objective “truth”. Best we can hope for is some sort of approximation of truth that is sort of like a kalidescope image viewed in a hall of mirrors.