Anonymous ID: 118562 March 11, 2022, 5:16 a.m. No.15837514   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7676

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/u-n-council-to-meet-at-moscow-s-request-over-claim-of-u-s-biolabs-as-zelensky-dismisses-chemical-weapons-allegation/ar-AAUVH5R?ocid=msedgntp

 

The Washington Post

U.N. council to meet at Moscow’s request over U.S. biolabs claim, as Zelensky dismisses chemical weapons allegation

Adela Suliman - 1h ago

 

The U.N. Security Council will meet Friday at Russia’s request to discuss Moscow’s claims of U.S.-supported chemical and biological weapon labs in Ukraine — allegations both Washington and Kyiv vehemently deny.

 

Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s first deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, announced the request for a Security Council meeting in a tweet late Thursday.

 

“Russian Mission asked for a meeting of #Security Council for 11 March to discuss the military biological activities of the US on the territory of #Ukraine,” Polyanskiy said.

 

The allegation of U.S. “biological activities” in Ukraine, presented without evidence, has been dismissed by the Biden administration as Russian disinformation.

 

“This is exactly the kind of false flag effort we have warned Russia might initiate to justify a biological or chemical weapons attack,” Olivia Dalton, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, said late Thursday, according to the Associated Press. “We’re not going to let Russia gaslight the world or use the U.N. Security Council as a venue for promoting their disinformation.”

 

White House warns Russia could use chemical weapons in Ukraine, rejects false ‘conspiracy’ of U.S. biolabs

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also denied the Russian accusations in a video address to his war-torn nation, posted Thursday on Facebook.

 

“No chemical or any other weapons of mass destruction were developed on my land. The whole world knows that,” he said.

 

“They accuse us … that we are allegedly developing biological weapons, allegedly we are preparing a chemical attack. This makes me really worried,” he added, noting that he is the father of two children.

 

“It is they who are capable of this,” he said, referring to Russia. “They have already done such things in other countries … and they will do so again,” he added. “Using ammonia? Using phosphorus? What else have you prepared for us?”

 

Zelensky said laboratories in Ukraine were “engaged in ordinary science … not military technology.” He also warned that if Russia does deploy such chemical weapons, it should prepare for the “most severe sanctions response.”

 

“We’ve been repeatedly convinced, if you want to know Russia’s plans, look at what Russia accuses others of,” he added.

 

developed.”

 

How the right embraced Russian disinformation about ‘U.S. bioweapons labs’ in Ukraine

The U.S. has also hit back at Beijing for echoing Moscow’s “conspiracy theories.”

 

“This Russian military operation has uncovered the secret of the U.S. labs in Ukraine, and this is not something that can be dealt with in a perfunctory manner,” China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said Thursday, according to the Associated Press, repeating similar claims he made earlier this week.

 

“It is not something they can muddle through by saying that China’s statement and Russia’s finding are disinformation, and are absurd and ridiculous.”

 

While China claims it has not taken sides in the conflict — neither denouncing the Russian invasion nor overtly endorsing it — state media and Chinese foreign ministry officials regularly echo Russian propaganda and the Russian biolab theory has quickly spread online, racking up millions of views on the social media platform, Weibo.

 

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba tweeted Thursday: “The manic obsession with which various Russian officials fantasize about non-existent biological or chemical weapons or hazards in Ukraine is deeply troubling and may actually point at Russia preparing another horrific false flag operation.”

Anonymous ID: 118562 March 11, 2022, 6:10 a.m. No.15837896   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-warns-special-counsel-over-provocative-court-filing/ar-AAUUi30?ocid=msedgntp

 

Judge warns special counsel over provocative court filing

 

Afederal judge delivered a warning to special counsel John Durham on Thursday after recent court filings became fodder for pro-Trump media and prompted incendiary allegations from the former president himself.

 

“Keep in mind that the pleadings in this case are under a microscope and may be employed for one reason or another by folks for reasons that have nothing to do with the ultimate issues in this case,” U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Cooper said after offering the attorneys working for Durham a chance to correct any “misinterpretation” of their earlier filings. They declined.

 

Cooper’s admonishment came in the case of Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer with Democratic Party ties whom Durham has charged with making false statements to the FBI.

 

According to Durham, Sussmann convened a meeting with then-FBI general counsel James Baker in late 2016 and provided explosive allegations about potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia. Those allegations were based on cybersecurity research conducted by one of Sussmann’s clients, Rodney Joffe. But Durham says Sussmann misled Baker by declining to reveal that he was presenting the information on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, rather than simply as a good citizen without a political interest.

 

Sussmann has denied that the meeting was convened on the campaign’s behalf and argued that Baker was well aware of his ties to the Democratic Party, largely through his law firm, Perkins Coie. Marc Elias, a longtime attorney at the firm, was the top lawyer for the Clinton campaign in 2016.

 

But the most explosive moment in the case came last month when Durham filed a motion for Cooper to review whether Sussmann’s attorneys had a conflict of interest. In the filing, Durham’s team laid out a string of allegations that suggested Joffe tapped into confidential pools of internet data in order to try to prove that Donald Trump or his allies were communicating with the Russians.

 

Durham’s prosecutors said that Joffe and his associates had access to nonpublic data because of their work for the government, and that they “exploited this arrangement” by mining White House data “for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.”

 

The filing immediately became fodder for pro-Trump media outlets that erroneously interpreted it as a suggestion that even after Trump was inaugurated, Joffe surveilled the Trump White House. Trump himself tweeted that it proved he had been spied on, and suggested that such activities would once have been punishable by death.

 

Sussmann quickly moved to strike the allegations from the court record, calling them false and inflammatory. And Joffe filed a separate, sealed action in federal court seeking to expunge the details that referenced him, albeit without using his name.

 

At Thursday’s hearing, held by videoconference, Cooper said he agreed with Sussmann’s lawyers that those details were “not necessary” to resolve the conflicts issue. The judge also briefly pressed Durham’s team to explain why it included the detailed allegations against Sussmann and Joffe in its filings related to a conflict of interest.

 

“I didn’t see any link to areas that were relevant,” said Cooper, an appointee of President Barack Obama. “I don’t know why the information was in there.”

 

Cooper noted that Sussmann did not object to the court’s reviewing a potential conflict of interest and that the whole matter could have been handled cooperatively in about “20 minutes.” Indeed, the judge quickly ruled the conflicts waived during Thursday’s hearing, but he also lamented that the provocative filing led to a “sideshow.”

 

Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew DeFilippis, a member of Durham’s team, defended the filing, saying that prosecutors wanted “a crystal clear factual record” related to the alleged conflicts.

 

However, when given the chance by the judge to make any corrections or clarifications that could set matters straight, DeFilippis declined.

 

“We don’t want to get into that game. We’re being very careful,” he said. “We think everything we said in the motion was accurate. I’d be hesitant to call out misinterpretations or misstatements that may be out there.”

 

“I extend a presumption of good faith to all counsel, especially government counsel,” he said. “I’m not going to strike anything from the record. … Striking it will not unring the bell and will probably make the bell ring even louder.”

 

 

“Until we swear a jury in this case,” the judge said, “you folks have an audience of one: me.”

 

durham is coming

Anonymous ID: 118562 March 11, 2022, 6:50 a.m. No.15838157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8168 >>8214

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10602859/DA-drop-murder-charge-against-Denver-TV-station-guard.html

 

Prosecutors will drop a second-degree murder charge against a former television station security guard who shot a pro-police demonstrator following protests in downtown Denver in 2020.

 

Matthew Dolloff's attorney, Douglas Richards, said the office of Denver District Attorney Beth McCann informed him by phone Thursday that prosecutors would dismiss the charge at a pre-trial hearing March 21. Dolloff did not face any other charges in the case.

 

'They just said they don't believe they can prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt based upon the evidence,' said Richards, who declined further comment.

 

Carolyn Tyler, a spokeswoman for the district attorney's office, said prosecutors had informed the family of the 49-year-old victim, Lee Keltner, that the case would be dismissed.

 

'In line with our ethical obligations, we cannot overcome the legal justifications of self-defense or defense of others,' she said in an emailed statement.

 

Dolloff was hired by KUSA-TV to protect a producer covering the October 10, 2020, 'Patriot Muster' demonstration and 'BLM-Antifa Soup Drive' counterprotest.

 

Police say Keltner was arguing with a Black man as the rallies broke up before getting into an altercation with Dolloff.

 

Dolloff's attorney, Douglas Richards, said the office of Denver District Attorney Beth McCann informed him by phone Thursday that prosecutors would dismiss the charge

+8

View gallery

Dolloff's attorney, Douglas Richards, said the office of Denver District Attorney Beth McCann informed him by phone Thursday that prosecutors would dismiss the charge

 

Keltner slapped Dolloff in the head, and Dolloff pulled a handgun and shot Keltner as Keltner fired pepper spray at him, according to an arrest affidavit. A cellphone video taken by KUSA´s producer suggests Keltner was upset that his initial dispute was being recorded.

 

The video shows Keltner in a confrontation with a man wearing a T-shirt that read, 'Black Guns Matter.' A bystander is trying to defuse the argument.

 

Dolloff was visibly stunned as he immediately surrendered to riot police who rushed in to arrest him. He was booked on suspicion of first-degree murder and is being held at the Downtown Detention Center without bond.

 

The video then shows Keltner, holding a spray can, walking out of view. A man´s voice - it´s unclear if it´s Keltner - is heard saying the area was no place for cameras.

 

'Get the cameras out of here or I´m going to (expletive) you up,' the unidentified man says. Keltner and Dolloff are then shown scuffling before the video stops.

 

The producer resumed filming after the shooting and tells responding officers he is with the press and says of Keltner, 'That guy was going to get me.' He also says the security guard shot Keltner because Keltner used pepper spray.

 

Dolloff pleaded not guilty in May 2021 and was set to go to trial in April. His attorneys had argued that he was acting in self-defense when he shot Keltner.

 

Dolloff faced between 16 and 48 years in prison if convicted of second-degree murder.