Anonymous ID: 40a4d7 May 29, 2018, 10:39 p.m. No.1584447   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4490

>>1584125

>Please don't start all that boycott abc stuff-I'm not a censor and they have the right to do as they please.

A boycott is not censorship.

Roseanne knows this.

She also knows that people have a right to do as they wish with their 'buying power'.

We couldn't censor abc if we tried.

A boycott is just another way of saying 'vote with your feet'.

Leave the store and don't buy there.

You don't even need a valid reason not to buy. It's nobodies business how you spend your hard earned cash.

 

From a different perspective, the argument could be presented this way.

The boycott is not because of 'Roseanne Losing Her Job'.

The boycott IS because of the network's decision to CENSOR freedom of expression.

Roseanne and her admirers are the victims of the censorship.

Patriots don't play the victim game. That game is left for the SJWs of the world.

Patriots defend their God given, naturally inherent, Constitutionally protected rights.

This is not a play on words or some form of 'hidden agenda'.

This is why we fight.

 

And now to you, anon:

>>Again, this is not normal behavior for someone who just lost their hit TV show (and millions of dollars).

FOX has already committed to taking over the show's production.

And even if they don't, Roseanne has shown that she's a warrior.

Principled response to actions based on principles.

The money is not an issue because Patriots are not PAYtriots.

 

We first started to discuss the boycott only a few breads back. (#1983 Our Republic).

This must have gotten some traction because Roseanne is already tweeting about it.

Anonymous ID: 40a4d7 May 29, 2018, 10:49 p.m. No.1584496   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1584223

This loser's father was the manager and he forced his son to pay for lunch?

Why would the son have to stand in line to begin with, even if he did have to pay for it.

If the father can confirm the story, then the father knows the son was tricked, so why take away the son's lunch?

If the father can confirm the story, why didn't he go after the guy, supposedly POTUS, and demand that he pay?

If the father can confirm the story, why didn't he confront the guy who just stole from his son?

 

I could go on.

Anonymous ID: 40a4d7 May 29, 2018, 10:58 p.m. No.1584557   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1584490

>There is NO confirmation at all that …

Fully aware.

That's why I added:

>And even if they don't, Roseanne has shown that she's a warrior.

In order to prevent people like you from having to post the obvious.

You posted anyway.

Hmmm…

The point you so poignantly missed is that:

[Roseanne's tweet was a]

Principled response to actions [she took] based on principles.

The money is not an issue [to her] because Patriots are not PAYtriots.