That isn't how evidence works. Evidence proves a thing is true by its preponderance. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. So you can have faith that someone flew, but to prove to me man flew 300 years ago requires evidence. It doesn't become a fact because you have failed to disprove it ever happened.
>Facts are wrong all the time.
Then they weren't facts. They were dis or misinformation. I don't have to disprove what hasn't been proven. One doesn't prove they are innocent, another must prove they were guilty.
To anyone. I would hope, as Anons, we have all learned this lesson about history.