>>1584915

Sorry for being a fag and tagging my own shit but:

>>1584309

>>1584362

(This is what's on #362 in cas with don't want to go back)

Especially since Awans will be back in the news due to the Seth Rich info coming out.

Julian Assange will prove Seth Rich gave Wikileaks the emails. This implodes the Russia narrative but doesn't answer why the Obama admin went to extreme lengths to create it in the first place. Answer: Valerie Jarret. The fact that she was the controlling factor in Obama's decisions and she is working for the Muslim Brotherhood will undoubtedly be revealed d/t the Awan's IT scandal.

The way I see it is Seth Rich snagged the DNC emails and sent to WL. Awans dimed him out and Dems/HRC Campaign utilized MS-13 to clean up the lose end. Remember Q said "187 can't testify" (or "talk" whichever one). So going through public disclosure that Seth Rich gave WL the emails will raise questions on his death exposing the MS-13 hitmen. It will then be shown that the Dems ordered it. This in turn exposes the Awan IT scandal (& the entire illegal spying operation on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood) and lastly the fact that Obama was an illegitimate foreign agent president.

Tl;dr

Exposing Valerie Jarrett is a linchpin in exposing it all.

>>1585149

I went full fag. Meant to tag >>1584540 not 362. I'll start my oven now.

>>1584860

Are u insinuating that a video will drop of Hillary calling Donna Brazille a buffalo? The event that supposedly wasn't caught on film b/c Hillary doesn't allow anyone near her with cellphones. Same event where she said "If that fucking bastard wins, we all hang from nooses".

>>1585204

Yeah that. I was just having difficulty typing b/c phone keeps lagging and my mind just exploded. There's a high probability a vid of that exists. It would certainly be toxic for all involved and the Dems would be btfo. Especially with Brazille speaking out/ writing a book this seems probable; and its clean enough to release but damning enough to annhilate that party/group of organizers. There wouldn't be a Dem today that wouldn't be excoriated for supporting Hilldawg if that dropped. Because almost all of them supported her; esp the political leaders/campaign members.

>>1585195

>>1585220

>>1585238

It's about early printing presses. Each letter was placed individually into the form. P and q are opposites of each other and ppl mixed them up (when looking at a printing press the letters are layed in reverse order)

>>1585335

Related to: don't forget to dot your "I"s and cross your "T"s. Essentially "pay attention to detail".

>>1585338

Not exactly. I've posted shit that made notables back in Jan/Feb timeframe while Q was on th board. Q didn't even acknowledge. Same stuff was posted by another anon a month and a half ago and Q lit up on it. Either Q doesn't monitor all the time, Q only refers to something when it's important, or I posted it too early for it to be acknowledged (mission essential). All I know is it was a major kick in the balls b/c it made me realize that just b/c we've already discovered something and tracked it it doesn't mean we'll know if it's valuable until Q says so. I can't even remeber wtf it was b/c I felt like months of work were useless and I barely checked in for a week. I felt like there was no point in digging/archiving when Q isn't currently on the board to give us direction. Ultimately I learned to just drive on, wait for Q, and quit being emotionally attached.

Tl;dr

We can repost things from our archives and start a new convo w/ Q depending on if they acknowledged it/seen it already or not.

>>1585422

Yep. I'm still here. It was a perfect Segway into Seth Rich and begins the process of uncovering Obama's fuckery

>>1585486

This.

>>1585512

Not sure how I can make this any clearer for (you) but I'll give it a whirl.

Everything we've catalogued means shit unless we know to go deeper or it has a certain connection, ergo Q. Things we take for granted (like Epstein has a pedo island) doesn't hold any value unless we know to go in a direction (ex: it was just dropped that Epstein turned FBI informant). This was a simple evolution of knowledge via current events (FBI release). But what's the value of that info? We can speculate that Epstein's information coupled w/ Weinstein's arrest will lead to massive arrests (seeing how Dershowitz joined his team). But that's all it is, a theory. If Q were to tag a post that claimed that theory we would know to keep going from there.

>>1585517

Did u intend to spell it "greedom" ?

>>1584810 New FBI Files show Feds gave billionaire pedophile Epstein greedom in Exchange for ‘Information’

>>1585564

Anon about a week ago alluded that gardisil causes sterilization and people weren't aware of this "side effect".

Gingrich just said this spying scandal goes all the way up to Valerie Jarrett and Obama.

(Fox News-tv)

>>1585622

POTUS congratulated the success of Roseanne's show. He wouldn't do that unless he knew what he was doing.