Umm, guys– why is there a sticky with BO "lecturing about clown bots" when it appears as if BO IS a clown bot (no offense intended). Lol
Look, we have multiple stickies concerning "Q's authenticity"– a fake and divisive "debate" if ever there could be one… And yet when legitimate concerns arise over BO, we have the weirdest responses, including BO not answering like a human directly, posting screenshots of concerned anons' posts (apparently to intimate in some way?), and then, rather than posting a sticky with proofs of authenticity to clear the air, we get a lecture telling us what we already know as if BO discovered it and needs to teach us…
Look, we have FAKE DOUBT ABOUT Q because BO allows it to be here. It's negative, but BO apologises for it and keeps it visible. Okay… But then we can't get proofs of BO's authenticity? Why not? What is there to be shy about? This isn't a game. You don't prove your authenticity with fake lectures. There is no legit reason to be coy and weird.
BO NEEDS to post proofs that he's not a clown, in some way. This has now reached the point of ridiculous. The point of "be united" is NOT "mindlessly let AI bots rule the discussion", or "BO is sacred and can not be questioned.".. But then why this silly speech instead of actually clearing the air? Why is Q's authenticity open to question (with BO's protection!), but BO's is a taboo subject that brings spasms of resistance from "anons" that don't seem quite believable…
Put this in notables please, this issue NEEDS to be settled. This has gone on too long.