Well this sets new low. Even in the times of war the government is going to exclude people who didn't take their vaccines from being able to access basic needs.
The ultimate ransom being tested un Ukraine.
Next question, will this set a trend if this conflict expanded into other countries.?
But look at Russia invading Ukraine..! Be angry about that, not this.
Did flawed PCR tests convince us Covid was worse than it really was? Britain's entire response was based on results - but one scientist says they should have been axed a year ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10606107/Did-flawed-tests-convince-Covid-worse-really-was.html
And many of those who were 'pinged' and forced to isolate as a contact of someone who tested positive – causing a huge strain on the economy – did so unnecessarily.
Such statements, it must be said, have been roundly dismissed by top experts. And those scientists willing to give credence such concerns have been shouted down on social media, accused of being 'Covid-deniers', and even sidelined by colleagues.
But could they have been right all along?
Today, in the first part of a major new series, The Mail on Sunday investigates whether 'the science' that The Government so often said they were following during the pandemic was flawed, at least in some respects.
In the coming weeks we will examine if Britain's stark Covid death figure was overblown. We will also ask if lockdowns did more harm than good.
But this week, we tackle the debate around Covid tests, and examine whether there is any truth to the claims that they were never fit for purpose.
Last month a report by the research charity Collateral Global and academics at Oxford University concluded as much, stating that as many as one third of all positive cases may not have been infectious.
If they are right, that's a potentially staggering number – roughly six million cases.
The Oxford scientists branded the UK's testing programme – which cost an eye-watering £2bn-a-month – as 'chaotic and wasteful'.
It is, say these critics, not simply important that we learn from our mistakes.
For while testing will now only be routine offered to patients when they come into hospitals, or in other clinical settings, and to the vulnerable, PCRs will still be used to track the spread of the virus in the community. And should there be a resurgence, that number will once again inform policy.
In the UK, the government is encouraging people here to house 'refugees'.
Are they refugees or are they Nazis? Hmm..
>Where is the blood? What are those trusted doctors doing to him?
He doesn't appear to be in much pain does he? If you're arching your torso up like that it's going to put muscular pressure on the areas those nurses are working on. If those areas are compromised surely you're going to be in too much pain to support yourself like that..?
Exactly, no flinching in pain or anything that indicates he's injured.
So either the isn't injured or his painkillers are doing an incredible job at making him look perfectly normal.
Can't they talk over the phone? Or videoconference?
I used to wear those overalls when I spray painted cars..
Good point. Behind closed doors etc..