Just two observations regarding the QClock – no interpretation of their meanings (if any at all), just mentioning it because it somewhat stands out:

→ When counting the days that have no post from Q, then in the first "turning" (i.e. 12/07 – 02/04) there were 23 days.

The second "turning" (02/05 – 04/05) had 24 days without Q posts. We're in the 3rd cycle now, and there were (so far) only 13 days without a Q post.

→ Q posted "Phase I", "Phase 2" & "next phase will bring JUSTICE.". The dates of these may (or not) coincide with the quarters in the clock:

Phase 1 could have been first cycle + first quarter (i.e. 1st Q post or 12/07 until 02/20 = 5 quarters)

Phase 2 started & announced on 02/21 lasting thru 05/06 (1 cycle + 1 quarter = 5 quarters)

Phase 3 started 05/07, but announced earlier ("pre_stage" on 05/04 due to comm silence between 05/04 & 05/08). If true, Phase 3 would last thru 07/20 and phase 4 start 07/21.

(also attached example of today's qclock)

>>1586028

>Found a connection(?) from POTUS Tweet on March 31

Looks rather like "11. Marz 2018"…. "langsamgehtslos" – I see. I don't quite understand today's graphic yet in >>1585865 but the day's just started, and the other two make sense to me.

>>1586103

There was a set of PDFs as well, zipped @ mega.nz, containing all 720 (12 hrs) minutes for those who're not scared of latex-created pdfs … lol. I could dig out the link, if needed.

>>1586114

Not sure if anon still needs svg files. Can create them pretty quickly probably.

>>1586134

Not sure yet, myself. Maybe you would find some message Q pointed to, like demonstrated in >>1585865 (1st image), and in that message find another marker or some "delta" (in minutes).

So you'd then wind then clock by these number of minutes, or to that next marker, and check that message as well. But all just ideas so far …

>>1586245

oops sorry, see it now. Was unable to view larger version before.