Anonymous ID: ef01f0 May 30, 2018, 5:55 a.m. No.1585925   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Why Has All Been Quiet Re: Two Meetings Last Week?

Spitballing.

The first meeting showed /ourguys/ that Sessions and Huber are coordinating attack with IG help.

Leave it all be for now.

 

The second meeting was the opposite because it had the dems in it.

They were told by DOJ/FBI that because of ongoing investigation there would be no release of docs because of sensitive intel on sources/methods/doxxing.

 

Now, /ourguys/ know that there's no need for these docs anymoe because the Huber investigation plus IG report will be enough to try/prosecute/convict DS fuckery. They all go along with second meeting whith DS dems because DOJ/FBI confirm that release ofsources/methods will damage investigations. The only difference between the two meetings is that in the first one, the damage would be to the Huber/DS investigation, whereas in the second meeting the 'damage' would be to the Mueller and related investigations.

 

Everybody is happy.

No one has to leak.

Comfy levels high for all involved.

 

No sauce, just 'spidey-sense' tingling.

Anonymous ID: ef01f0 May 30, 2018, 6:11 a.m. No.1586029   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6041 >>6085

>>1585959

POTUS has been complaining about Sessions from the day Sessions recused himself. Nothing has change.

Q has been saying TRUST SESSIONS from the start. Nothing has changed.

In fact, Q keeps saying TRUST SESSIONS because ppl keep trying to undrmine that trust both here on /qresearch/ and 'out there' on the 'stage'.

 

Me?

Just chillin' and enjoyin' the show.

Anonymous ID: ef01f0 May 30, 2018, 6:26 a.m. No.1586107   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1585930

>Common sense politics and no weed, or get buzzed and have demoncrap bullshit …bla bla bla.

False dichotomy.

Those are not the only two options, although you might think/believe they are.

This has been explained to you and/or others now several times.

Right here in this bread!

?^&#(?!!!

Anonymous ID: ef01f0 May 30, 2018, 6:40 a.m. No.1586208   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6313

>>1585903

>but did he step down to prosecute?

I recall him saying this in an interview (on fox?) back when he announced his retirement.

Disappointed he couldn't get anything done in congress because of limited powers.