TRUSTING INTENSIFIES
>I am wondering if the replacement crew is here this morning or something.
seen it happen often: good diggings/board vibe in the evening, and following morning is a parallel universe where that never happened… shouldn't be too much of a worry, frustrating to run around in circles, but eh
dude.
why
SO MUCH PROMOTION?
you twatters fans don't understand that: the more you push them, the glower they glow.
and that one is burned already.
you will try again (but likely will hang on to it like pathetically done with BC for weeks and weeks)
damn y'all are annoying with your fandoms, you just can't control yourselves, however often it happens, same thing. EVERY. TIME.
go find that fucker "interesting" in its own thread if you really must but fer fuck's sake get the twatter honeypots off of our general, your sad excuses are tired and worn and just no good anymore
well yeah, >>1586630 because >>1586638 / >>1586645
i guess you twatt guys are bored of the 1439 crumbs, to be so desperate to get a fix on twatter.
such nice light to bask in, getting called a shill for refusing to be spammed with that shit again (notice they are invited to follow them on their own: they don't. that's not the program).
this is precisely what we're "scared" of: dozens of annoying comments screaming SHILL, or "but muh interesting", etc, etc.
reruns. boring.
misdirection
we don't disagree on the date, just the persistent annoyance of promoting bullshit twatters
>We may actually be in the 10 days of darkness this time
quote it. what "10 days of darkness"?
Exact quote.
get a room
there wouldn't be 100+ posts about it here it was just about a
> chat with some dude on Twitter
problem is, marketing and promotion for ETS here is hitting crazy levels right now.
they bring nothing new,
distract from the crumbs (still plenty undug),
and just glow so hard.
>any time someone (x)
it's
>you shills go nuts
again and again… yeah, yeah.
none of that would happen if you'd just get a thread like the Dilley-ites did.
You've been kindly asked to, yet don't.
And then complain and discard any negative comment on your doomed-to-fail enterprise as "shills".
darn, our ebil plans are foiled again.
ok too late for this one, but then whatever you do, DO NOT look into gunther project
>Come on people….I expect more out of you.
waves of "consensus" anons are frustrating, but it's an illusion.
and they're not very good at it
might be a few useful idiots in there who fall for it, unfortunate but not big losses if true.
results the same.
what is gained by promoting these accounts?
what is gained by harvesting replies/complaints about it?
what is gained by refusing to make a dedicated thread?
what is gained by calling anons refusing to follow shills?
>>1586994 oops/hehe, gotcha.
>when folks are screaming at you not to
why refuse polite invitations to start a thread, where such digging would be welcome and uniterrupted?
what is gained by promoting these accounts?
what is gained by harvesting replies/complaints about it?
what is gained by refusing to make a dedicated thread?
what is gained by calling anons refusing to follow shills?
> If said thread does not already exist, I myself will create it & link it here.
that would be great, thanks, as i don't mind anons wasting their time with the twatters, but ours.
any anon worth its while knows by now that posting updates about BC/ES here does and will provoke complaints, and very few posts actually share info (instead of promoting the accounts/asking for comments/insisting on how interesting they are, etc).
yet they cry SHILL! the second an anon replies, and none of them have even replied to legitimate questions yet, let alone made a thread.
thank you for it.