dChan
Anonymous ID: fc0656 May 30, 2018, 7:24 a.m. No.1586497   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6517 >>6545 >>6556 >>6967

>>1586451

Trust the Plan.

What is the Plan?

Who are all the members involved?

What is the plans agenda?

How long for the plan to take place?

How will we know what the plan is?

Who created this plan?

Are we sure this plan is good?

How will we know if the plan isn't working?

 

Please feel free to blindly follow a one letter agent whom shows up put of the blue and says TRUST ME ANS MY PLAN! Do not under any circumstances question anything.

 

For if you do you can be sure the brain dead sharks in the water attack anything that moves.

 

So while you want to blindly trust something YOU have NO idea about with people or things YOU have never MET nor spoke too. Is YOUR fucking choice.

 

The rest of us who learned a LONG time ago not to trust ANYTHING at face value will continue to OBSERVE and ASK QUESTIONS.

 

What so you morons call it?

Oh yes. Concernfag.

 

Well. I would rather be a concerned fag then a walk around blindly following internet air fag because some one told me too.

 

Idiot.

Anonymous ID: fc0656 May 30, 2018, 7:34 a.m. No.1586573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1586545

You don't know who is dividing and who is not. LOL! And you clearly didn't read or comprehend anything that was written. Therefore your commental is null and void.

 

Nice try though!

Anonymous ID: fc0656 May 30, 2018, 7:36 a.m. No.1586595   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6697 >>6851

The VATICAN uses Q Source

 

The Q source (also Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's Oral Tradition.[1][2][3]

 

Along with Marcan priority, Q was hypothesized by 1900, and is one of the foundations of most modern gospel scholarship.[4] B. H. Streeter formulated a widely accepted view of Q: that it was written in Koine Greek; that most of its contents appear in Matthew, in Luke, or in both; and that Luke more often preserves the text's original order than Matthew. In the two-source hypothesis, the three-source hypothesis and the Q+/Papias hypothesis Matthew and Luke both used Mark and Q as sources. Some scholars have postulated that Q is actually a plurality of sources, some written and some oral.[5] Others have attempted to determine the stages in which Q was composed.[6]

 

Q's existence has been questioned.[6] Omitting what should have been a highly treasured dominical document from all early Church catalogs, its lack of mention by Jerome is a conundrum of modern Biblical scholarship.[7][dubious ] But copying Q might have been seen as unnecessary as it was preserved in the canonical gospels. Hence, it was preferable to copy the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, "where the sayings of Jesus from Q were rephrased to avoid misunderstandings, and to fit their own situations and their understanding of what Jesus had really meant".[8] Despite challenges, the two-source hypothesis retains wide support.