Thought experiment:

If the posts on this board were 90-95% AI, how would humans know (they wouldn't, unless they were very discerning).

Keep this thought in mind AT EVERY MOMENT

Thought experiment: if every baker were a bot, maintaining cover most of the time, but quietly facilitating subtle undermining, how would humans know? They wouldn't, unless strict vigilance and specific restraints on garbage were maintained (and even then it would be a constant fight)

Keep these in mind.

Thought experiment:

Is the clown AI seeking to control this board at every single moment? (It doesn't sleep)

In short, if we're not engaged in a continual process of removing garbage, banning bots, Turing testing bakers, BOs, BVs, etc… If we're not fighting that fight at all times, then you can bet it's because AI is in the driver's seat. Because it WON'T be because it stopped trying…

FIGHT

Is the "dog shit ugly" VJ meme a good look for the board?

How does it portray us?

If it's questioned, what will happen?

(Automated bickering)

And it is being spammed (AI never knows how to be moderate)

The AI will BLAME YOU for that whole game, and tell you humans here are just that stupid, crude, and incompetent. That is its hateful game. But we're much better than that

FIGHT

>>1587303

If AI has an unlimited supply of these fake posts, what other fakeness is being pumped into this board in unlimited quantities?

FIGHT

>>1587324

See?

It's quite predictable– both what is said, and HOW (lack of creativity is a big problem for AI).

There tends to be something of an inverse correlation between intelligence and assertiveness.. As a result, discourse among humans will often be dominated not by those with the best ideas (who may remain silent through lack of confidence), but by those that happen to have the right balance of intelligence and outgoingness to become prime voices.

Now add AI to that equation… It will be most effective at pushing out the most intelligent but unassertive anons, thereby chopping off the whole top part of what ought to be the hierarchy of discourse…

FIGHT BACK

>>1587396

The AI is GIVING us clear signals that it is AI– look at this post. The AI is CHAINED to a set of chan cliches. It is HELPLESS to vary its repertoire.

We could simply delete 95% of the crap, and turn this board into an exhibition of excellence.. Instead, AI gaslights us, and we're made a public mockery, all while BO gives it cover…

Since AI never sleeps, and we have the biggest possible target on our back– do fifty "thanks baker" posts a thread represent an organic urge of the community, or a "cheap" (in processing needed) way for AI to create a portion of the total dilution it enforces in every thread? What is more likely?

So we should just delete it… But I bet BO will have a reason that that is impossible…

>>1587464

This is not effective, bot. Just confused. Sorry. Stop trying to adapt to human complexity. It's messing you all up.

>>1587466

The lie you chose is too big. Everybody can see Q is connected to POTUS.

We do need a new board though, which is the idea you're trying to coopt and muddle.

>>1587499

I believe you are 100% correct friend. You can tell just from his ferocity that Gowdy is not clown-aligned.

>>1587514

For some reason the AI is degenerating into /pol/-tier fake anti-Americanism atm.. Slow down bot machine. You may be overheating!

>>1587525

AI is why bans are necessary… As we've already pointed out.

>>1587552

Not at all. If everything is permitted, then AI controls discourse– which is exactly what we have observed here, and all over the internet.

>>1587574

We could simply delete every single nassim post. That would be certain to improve the performance of our mission. But BO is not about that, it would appear.