Considering how long it has been in qanon.pub, you would think Q would have said something by now if it was false.
I just noticed in Alice's tweet, the booms go like this both times…
BOOM 2 "O"s
BOOOM 3 "O"s
BOOM 2 "O"s
BOOOM 3 "O"s
I found that interesting.
Well, let me be objective here. I've been following these 2 accounts, but I wouldn't call myself invested. Entertained, yes. The only important thing that has come out of BC17 and ETS, in my opinion, is the claim that Julian Assange will make a public speech on 6/11, and that it pertains to the "SKY EVENT."
So far the only sticking point that I consider worthy of concern (I hate that word in this context) is this business about Q Post 74 on qanon.pub not matching the graphic associated with Q getting a trip code. That IS important. It's like a checksum error in this whole thing. I don't know if Q just overlooked it way back when, or what.
If we don't see Julian Assange in 4.5 days, then this whole ETS thing is bullshit, but we still have a great 6/11 and everything continues to move forward.
Until then, I will continue to follow, but with 1 extra grain of salt.