>>15879227 lb
Lawfag here. Re Smollett: No, you do not need new evidence to file an appeal. You can claim procedural or evidence (admitting or refusing to admit) maneuverings or other rulings (or judicial statements) during the pre-trial, trial, or post-trial proceedings violated your client's rights (Constitutional, procedural, etc.) or were unfairly prejudicial to your client. You can also claim that you had ineffective assistance of counsel, or the like. There are numerous grounds on which to file an appeal that do not require new evidence. Doesn't mean they'll win. Just time consuming, delaying incarceration (in his case), expensive, time to rally the social justice warriors to ramp up political pressures, threats, etc.
Immediately after the sentencing, I heard a commentator claim that the judge stated in his hour long sentencing preamble that Smollett repeatedly committed perjury during trial and that shows the judge is biased because Smollett is entitled to due process before being "convicted" of perjury. This commentator also claimed the judge "lunged" at a Smollett's female attorney during a proceeding at bench. I don't know the facts, didn't see it, but sounds absurd. From what I saw, there are huge plexiglass barriers up between the judge and everyone else for "COVID COVID COVID."
I thought, "Here we go."
Much more to come, I'm sure.
Including, perhaps, new evidence. But it is not needed for an appeal to be filed.