>So many questions
Not really.
Account owner already confirmed they're fake Q.
Notable nom
Not really.
The only "bUt gUiSe' is from the shills lying and trying to trick readers into falsely believing the account is real AFTER the owner already confirmed they're fake Q.
They jumped the shark as soon as they tried to take narrative control over what is and what is not 'disinformation'.
After 4 straight years of Q showing how they lie and spread disinfo, the more they mention 'disinformation' the more attention they attract on their own disinfornation.
Not really.
Account owner already CONFIRMED they are fake Q on Feb 25.
Shills have SINCE been trying to trick readers into falsely believing it's not fake Q, conveniently always pretending the disavowal doesn't exist.
Not really.
This:
Is a much better argument than
For the former has evidence.
You new here?
>And Q never did that right?
Correct, troll.
kek.
I am only 'suggesting' that the account owner CONFIRMED they are fake Q trolling fake news.
Nah, you're suggesting that anons believe in a false narrative that is even contradicted by evidence from the very source you're intentionally gaslighting about.
>accept it without question
You're projecting your own acceptance without question that the account is real Q.
Shills claim @Q is real, despite the owner CONFIRMING he's fake Q, and you accept it without question.
Let's assume you're not a low IQ shill who is making a total ass of themselves.
Why do you care so much about Anons posts that show confirmation TS@Q is fake?
You're projecting your own anxious, agenda driven propaganda that @Q is real Q, despite the account owner CONFIRMING they're fake.
Yes, gaslighting.
Some random shill claims @Q is real: You accept 'without question'.
Account owner posts they're fake, and yet you still accept shill narrative 'without question'.
Why are you giving some random shill claims about a source more weight than the source itself?
You retards are pushing a lie.
Your 'disinformation' is not necessary
>Q also stated many times all this was for a LARP
Q never admitted or confirmed they are a larp.
Q was referring to fake news' narrative of who Q is.
Your 'expanded thinking' is a shill attempt to trick anons into following a fake Q as if it were real Q.
The shills are pushing a contradictory narrative.
They want us to believe @Q is lying, and yet they want us to trust the @Q account.
Trying to square a circle.
Gibberish.
It's not the 'same logic'.
>I never once said I thought TS NOT Q was real.
That's because you're trying to have your cake and eat it too.
You push the narrative, you only target anons who post @Q is fake, you do not target anons who post @Q is real, you apply different standards depending on which 'side' is posted, telling Anon who post it's fake to 'expand their thinking', but not Anons who post it's real.
You're a hack.
Nah, it's correct.
You're a hack trying to push a narrative and pretending that you're not by 'i never explicitly said @Q was real'!
You're just trying to get the narrative to be believed.