Anonymous ID: c64baa March 17, 2022, 8:47 a.m. No.15884022   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4040 >>4048 >>4051 >>4077

>>15884005

Not Really.

The only "bUt gUiSe' is from the shills ignoring the fact the account was set up before anyone had access to Truth Social, is used, and is retruthed by important people in our movement we can't prove aren't on the Q Team.

Only a 5 year old, someone blinded by an emotional connection to this board, or a shill, would even try to argue it's not noteworthy.

Anonymous ID: c64baa March 17, 2022, 9 a.m. No.15884100   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4121

>>15884077

Are you suggesting there's no evidence of when the account was created or who is retruthing it?

That's 2/3 of my argument.

It's not a claim from someone, like what you're staking your position on. Nothing subjective about it. Why would you say this? Makes no sense. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here, but you're making it difficult.

Anonymous ID: c64baa March 17, 2022, 9:05 a.m. No.15884140   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4162 >>4179

>>15884121

The owner of an active account that was created before anyone else and is retruthed by the platform CEO regularly, claims it's fake and you accept this without question.

Let's assume you really are this simple-minded:

Why, then, would you care if this board finds the "troll posts" noteworthy?

Anonymous ID: c64baa March 17, 2022, 9:08 a.m. No.15884162   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4202 >>4213

>>15884121

>>15884140

Some random troll says not Q: accepted without question.

Devin fucking Nunes finds the posts notable: "NOT NOTABLE AT ALL"

Why are you giving some random troll's subjective statements more weight than Nunes' actions in your rationale?

How does one justify this calculation?

Anonymous ID: c64baa March 17, 2022, 9:39 a.m. No.15884400   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4603

>>15884334

Not every PF Report is notable to me, but bakers are still supposed to add them all.

At least this is reasoned argument, though.

Thanks for that.

The consensus vs "forced" nomination is an endless debate that will haunt bakers forever.

Anon sees both sides now after baking during the kinetic initiation of the Ukraine/Russia debacle. Before that I was heavily pro-consensus. Now I somewhat understand the importance of getting the information out regardless of if I think it's notable, factual, propaganda, etc.

Anonymous ID: c64baa March 17, 2022, 9:41 a.m. No.15884415   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15884379

Back to my original statement.

This is the DUMBEST TAKE EVER TO APPEAR ON THESE BOARDS, you simpleton.

-and this is coming from someone who doesn't think it's Q.