Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 10:34 a.m. No.158974   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9001 >>9009

>>158902

http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html?Source=ESSZsPSPR00gensEM&wtExtndSource=20180124140000_ATT_TWITTER_Corp%20Comm_N/A_Evergreen_Product%20Specific_Temp%20-%20Audit_20180124_Organic_Announcement_N/A_N/A_N/A_Click-thru_No_1302346074_ATT_TW_

 

Consumers Need an Internet Bill of Rights

 

Government rules for the internet have been debated for nearly as long as the internet has existed, even before a professor coined the term “net neutrality” 15 years ago.

 

The internet has changed our lives and grown beyond what anyone could have imagined. And it’s done so, for the most part, with very few—but often changing—rules. Regulators under four different presidents have taken four different approaches. Courts have overturned regulatory decisions. Regulators have reversed their predecessors. And because the internet is so critical to everyone, it’s understandably confusing and a bit concerning when you hear the rules have recently changed, yet again.

 

It is time for Congress to end the debate once and for all, by writing new laws that govern the internet and protect consumers.

 

Until they do, I want to make clear what you can expect from AT&T.

 

AT&T is committed to an open internet. We don’t block websites. We don’t censor online content. And we don’t throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content. Period.

 

We have publicly committed to these principles for over 10 years. And we will continue to abide by them in providing our customers the open internet experience they have come to expect.

 

But the commitment of one company is not enough. Congressional action is needed to establish an “Internet Bill of Rights” that applies to all internet companies and guarantees neutrality, transparency, openness, non-discrimination and privacy protection for all internet users.

 

Legislation would not only ensure consumers’ rights are protected, but it would provide consistent rules of the road for all internet companies across all websites, content, devices and applications. In the very near future, technological advances like self-driving cars, remote surgery and augmented reality will demand even greater performance from the internet. Without predictable rules for how the internet works, it will be difficult to meet the demands of these new technology advances.

 

That’s why we intend to work with Congress, other internet companies and consumer groups in the coming months to push for an “Internet Bill of Rights” that permanently protects the open internet for all users and encourages continued investment for the next generation of internet innovation.

 

Randall Stephenson

 

AT&T Chairman and CEO

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 10:41 a.m. No.159044   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159001

REfereince Q's first post today:

 

>AT&T>No Such Agency [contract].

 

I'm CERTAIN that they'd be held to a higher standard contracting with No Such Agency

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 10:47 a.m. No.159089   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159009

IDK about "let", as if AT&T or ANY carrier actually has a choice in the matter. Try setting up nationwide/worldwide comms outside of the NSA and let's see how far it gets

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 10:55 a.m. No.159171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9381

>>159048

Looks like it's from B's Twitter account. I see that, and hashtag #ReleaseTheMemo

 

Entire photo =a (partial) screen shot from B's twitter, you might want to look for the original there.

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 11:11 a.m. No.159321   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159232

No prob. I clear my cache regularly, that speeds things up for me, even got through the DDOS attacks here unscathed by doing that. Also, using Epic Privacy Browser, stays pretty clean by default

 

>>159277

No, I'm not the qcodefag anon

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 11:23 a.m. No.159435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159372

You asked why this was relevant to Q, thus, tagged you, not because i didn't think you knew the answer.

 

As to why it's relevant, see:

>>>/greatawakening/44

have you noted that most major divisions esp. in the US are red vs blue? Why is that relevant?

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 11:35 a.m. No.159560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9574

>>159484

plus, it's not like gang members ain't tech savvy, will dox the posters of these dumb ass memes QUICK & meet them outside the front door faster than a clovvn will

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 11:37 a.m. No.159587   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159562

they're trying to set somebody up to make the gangs do the clowns work for them, once they get doxxed..MY guess? those memes are the work of clowns, which is why i ignored it, #ItsATrap

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 11:41 a.m. No.159614   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159574

but seriously though, attempts to unite those homegrown gangs have been ongoing for decades, so i seriously hope #TheGreatAwakening can help w/ that, that's a lotta manpower to help MAGA once it's refocused

Anonymous ID: 762044 Jan. 25, 2018, 11:42 a.m. No.159633   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>159590

>where did all the "Bloods are satanists" go?

>noticed they went silent? why's that?

 

EXACTLY! And that's why I posted the REAL meaning of BLOOD!

 

and HELL NO i'm not a BLOOD, and won't tell this board how i know what they really are