Started last bread somehow -- group of fuckheads appear to highjack the clock research, calling curious anons shills and spreading lies (last bread)
>>1588553
>>1588602
It's autists after all, see everyone can and does go/research their own direction – no factions/splinter groups as far as I am concerned. But seeing concerted efforts to discredit other anons for no reasons is always suspicious.
As for the clock, I don't think we've figured it out yet completely, apart from some observations (that may or not) be coincidence (no posts on a single ray ([:25]), Q's pen posts, marker [:13], some news that fit quite well, etc)
One could say some things might have come out already, if the theory/assumption with the clock (and start date) is true. Those are rather not practical things to know (as how when HRC will be arrested for example), but the [:13] min marker is likely some kind of "confirmation".
Also this kind of clock can help sort things or connect them with each other like this anon did (pic, >>1585865 )
One can alo look at Q's "Phase I",
"Phase [2]" and phase 3 on this clock: They may have a length of 5 quarters each, i.e. 1 cycle + 1 quarter (2nd pic with colored circles)
And then for those asking when Q might return: In this 3rd cycle around the clock, we've only had 13 days w/o Q post. In the previous two cycles, we had each 23 & 24, respectively.
You're reversing the order of citations.
>some things might have come out already
Like I said, rather minor things, like for example the 13min marker on 04/19
or that there are no post on the [:25min] ray and other smaller things.
The 13 min marker may be a confirmation that the clock indeed started 12/07, as [:13] would not correspond to date 04/19 if it were different.
Please understand, that we're trying to figure out, why a clock was even mentioned by Q and what "wind the clock with all markers" might mean. Also, and if you were around back during cbts (beginning) – there was a flurry about the qclock before, together with trying to riddle out the 43 connection on the spiderweb etc
So whatever you decide to do (or not) – don't expect others to give you a manual when we're all (some more some less) trying to get smart from what was given as crumbs (even in not quite obvious form). Guess most anons don't care much if you'd find the idea about a clock futile or a waste of time … noone forces you to accept or understand it or to waste your time on it.