>>1588722 <<
i'm with ya, no rush.
comfy.
get used to it, anons, less and less training wheels all the way to nov.11
can you show an example of something learned that came out of
>the clock research
?
(besides circular-logic clock system "confirmations")
so now you've got factions of QlockAnons?
is this a splinter group?
>>1579221 Clockwork Qrange
see why a dedicated thread for that shit (we asked for weeks for you guys to do) can be useful?
>infiltrating this board to spread doubt and misinformation
all qresearch boards have never not been infiltrated, there is no pure "golden age" of shill-free anons
>the Q Clock graphic I made in the bread, the 1st one
ok, that one.
clearly there are many competing systems (but everyone is always talking of his as "the clock").
so much time spent on this…
so much posts telling anons to go dig into it…
can we haz 1 example of something gained?
>everyone can and does go/research their own direction
yes, of course.
>As for the clock, I don't think we've figured it out yet completely
again we agree…
clearly there are many competing systems (but everyone is always talking of his as "the clock").
so much time spent on this…
so much posts telling anons to go dig into it…
can we haz 1 example of something gained?
i'm not trying to understand the system anymore, not for me.
but at this point i would be pleasantly surprised to see SOMETHING OF VALUE, anything, that came from this method of analysis.
stillwaiting…
asking for an example of the value of this.
something gained, something understood.
information found.
but it seems the only replies given are graphics circling things and underlining others… the question in its simplest form: WHAT'S THE POINT?
What do you find positive and useful in [53] 05/29?
>the [:13] min marker is likely some kind of "confirmation".
what is confirmed?
>can help sort things or connect them with each other
can you give an example of something sorted out? (using words to make a statement, not circling numbers and drawing lines on a graphic)
>some things might have come out already
what things?
>like for example the 13min marker on 04/19
ok, he was pointing out the moment when NP talked of NK in the video… i guess you see it as a case of double meaning?
not otherwise seeing how "[:13] corresponds to date 04/19 " : because the 4/19 post has a 13 in it?
<whatever you decide to do (or not)
i'm alternating between trying to understand and trying to see the point.