So, it's as truthful of a source as WaPo, FoxNews, MSNBC, CNN, NYTimes, Vanity Fair, Rolling Stone, and Jen Psaki.
Link to sauce is 404 Not Found.
Wired mic on lapel?
RRN reported on the BioLabs in Ukraine and that report was confirmed by Gateway Pundit.
So, they've reported more truth than CNN this month. Why can't you give credit when/where credit is due? If RRN sends you into a blind rage of denialism, are you really an objective truthseeker?
You can allege that, but you can't definitively "prove" your claim. So what. Are you saying the BioLabs are a lie?
Conspiracy sites? Like all those fakenews sites that pushed Russia Russia Russia and the dossier. How is RRN any less legit than every MSM source?
What you described RRN doing is called news gathering and reporting. It doesn't matter who first "broke" the biolabs story, and it definitely didn't "break" on 8Kun before it dropped on Twitter. Honestly you sound like a shill for the fakenews. Is that you Sean Hannity?