>>15889422 (lb)
I must disagree completely. I know myself and how much the world is craving a single news source they can fully trust and not have to worry who’s tentacles are in the pockets of the owners manipulating narratives and pushing their own agendas for their own self interests. For starters, you could enact several ‘safeguards’ that can be installed etc where you essentially put a checks and balances system on yourself, your company and your message where you are able to work your situation or story against it to see if there’s a bias being injected or if a narrative that isn’t true is working its way into the stories and then neutralize it right there. I mean hell, there’s absolutely an AI you could set up to play the issues against a neutral position and get all the data you need to see how balanced your reporting is and what you are injecting yourself bias wise which then would be removed. It’s not hard to speak the truth and report real stories, not cgi & HW productions for B footage to entice war sentiment. Its actually quite simple to provide balanced and fair news but no one does it because ther don’t want to alienate anyone because they’re afraid of losing profits and/or viewers. If done correctly, people would tune in or subscribe because they respect the honesty - whether the agree with the subject matter or disagree with it, because it would be the TRUTH. So go shoot down someone else’s dreams because it just seems you’re sour and don’t want anyone to succeed.