Anonymous ID: ee29d7 March 19, 2022, 9:13 a.m. No.15898082   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8095 >>8096 >>8121 >>8203 >>8375

>>15898056

muh qanon erupts

 

==QAnon erupts after Josh Hawley floats child porn arguments over Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination

It's the same 'save the children' claim that Republicans know get their base\ fired up.==

Mike Rothschild

 

Mike Rothschild

 

Tech

 

Published Mar 18, 2022 Updated Mar 18, 2022, 9:35 am CDT

 

On Wednesday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) announced in a long Twitter thread that he discovered an “alarming pattern” in the rulings of Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s “treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

 

Hawley, a staunch ally of former President Donald Trump, believed the judge had “a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes” that went all the way back to her time in law school and encompassing her work on the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

 

Hawley’s complaints about Jackson included her questioning the effectiveness of the sex offender registry, proposing eliminating mandatory minimum sentencing for child pornography, advocating for lower than recommended sentences for child porn offenders, and claiming that a person can possess such material without actually being a pedophile.

 

Hawley’s thread immediately received pushback from Twitter users, many pointing out the Missouri Republican’s open support for overturning the 2020 election. The White House called the accusations “toxic” and “misinformation” taken out of the broader context behind those rulings.

 

But in attacking Judge Jackson’s record on issues related to such crimes, Hawley, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, signaled an intention to appeal during the hearing to the great mass of conspiracy theorists who obsess over “crimes against children” allegedly committed by Democrats.

 

Naturally, that means QAnon.

Anonymous ID: ee29d7 March 19, 2022, 10:18 a.m. No.15898410   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8429 >>8440

>>15898382

>Anons did do a lot of digging on Gannett

 

side note

 

The Gannett Digging was important and relevant. as it's a clown op. But anons absolutely never settled on Gannett. Q wouldn't have pointed it out if Cooper was just browsing USA Today

Anonymous ID: ee29d7 March 19, 2022, 10:21 a.m. No.15898429   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15898400

>>15898410

 

>>15898407

>would love to be able to see pics or posts about it, from back then.

yeah, it's a drag the archives pics are missing. I think there were two branches. The legitimate Gannett digs and then the Header is a foreign language and Anderson was browsing a pedo shopping site digs.

Anonymous ID: ee29d7 March 19, 2022, 10:39 a.m. No.15898511   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8521

>>15898440

>the digging on Gannett was a clown op?

 

>no it wastn't

I could have phrased that better.

The Gannett Digging was legit.

Gannett is a clown op

 

<And yes the headline spells Gannett.

that's like your opinion man

 

>>15898440

>anon is an "I was there-er" for it.

yep… so is this anon, and this anon provided sauce that it was never "settled"

so keep pushing it and prove my point if you want.

 

>>15897750 (You) pb

 

>>15897771 (You) pb

 

>>15897790 (You) pb

 

>>15897834 (You) pb

Anonymous ID: ee29d7 March 19, 2022, 10:41 a.m. No.15898521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8565 >>8581

>>15898511

>I could have phrased that better.

you know what. after re-reading, it was phrased just fine.

 

your reading comprehension is shit

 

The Gannett Digging was important and relevant.as it's a clown op.