To Hell with These Leftists

townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2022/03/20/to-hell-with-these-leftists-n2604762

Opinion

You probably shouldn’t write while pissed off, but I don’t really have the luxury to wait. I also doubt there will be any time before my deadline when these complete jackasses on the left aren’t doing something so worthless I wouldn’t revel in seeing them dive into a swimming pool only to discover there’s no water in it. They’ve turned me, and I’d guess one hell of a lot of other people, into people who literally can’t stand anything they’re pushing.

I honestly couldn’t care less about someone’s sexuality, never really gave a damn about it. As such, I have a lot of friends who happen to be gay. But their being gay doesn’t define who they are any more than being straight defines who I or my other friends are. I don’t care what some adult does with their genitals – I’m very live and let live. As long as who you do it with is of age and willing, you have to explain it to God, I don’t.

Thanks to the progressive movement’s determination to “divide to conquer” the American public, so many activists are now their sexual orientation. That they’re gay defines who many people are, which makes them incredibly boring and pathetic.

I know, I’m supposed to be supporting and caring, I’m just not. If your existence is so wrapped up in how you have sex, you’re a loser. If how you have sex plays an overriding role in your existence, your existence isn’t interesting to me. No amount of pressure is going to change that.

If you make up some pronouns and expect me to pretend they’re real and you’re not mentally broken because your parents didn’t love you enough, you’re going to be disappointed. I’d suggest you adopt my attitude and simply not give a damn, your life is going to be lonely and miserable if you spend it seeking validation of your existence from others – even if you get it, it’s fake and never enough.

If you’re a man pretending to be a woman, I don’t care. If you’re introduced to me as “Betty” with a full beard and bass voice, I’ll call you Betty. But that will likely be the only time we ever speak. I don’t have time for people’s delusions; reality is not based on your belief in it, nor is it dependent upon it. It just is. If you choose some other way of living, have fun, I’m not interested.

1/

>>15902907

If you’re a dude who sucked as swimmer who then pretended to be a girl and started winning against women, I will not celebrate you. Not because I wish ill upon you, I couldn’t care less what happens to you, but because you’re a man cheating. You want to wear a dress, I don’t care. You want me to pretend you aren’t a urinal user, not gonna happen.

You expect me to be fine with the idea of adults talking to kids, kindergarten through third grade, about any kind of sex or whatever gender delusions some mental midget thinks up in an edible haze and we’re going to have a problem. These Democrats in Florida are far too excited to do just that. Middle Eastern grooming gangs in the UK don’t get this excited about talking to young kids about this stuff.

If you’re a “sports” announcer or journalist and think I give a single chunk of last night’s thoroughly digested and expelled dinner what you think about anything related to any of this, you are sorely mistaken. If you feel compelled to virtue signal for your bosses, go to hell. If you’re sincerely moved to announce to the world your thoughts on something that has nothing to do with you, pretty much the same.

I simply don’t care. Moreover, since this incredibly forceful minority started getting even more militant, I’ve lost interest in anything they say or want. If you’re gonna be an A-hole, I’m gonna think of you as an A-hole and work or root against you.

It doesn’t matter how few they are, and they are few, a small group of committed people can accomplish horrible things. The Nazis were not a majority of Germans, not even close, they simply steamrolled everyone in their way.

Old or new, fascism is fascism. Don’t let these people win. Every puke at Yale who shouted down speakers this week should be expelled. If they aren’t, and you’re an alumni who, for some weird reason, gives them money, knock it off. Stop funding the enemy. And make no mistake, these people are your enemy.

Men are men, women are women, they can live however they want but must not be empowered to force you to deny reality so they can feel good about themselves. If that bothers them, so what? If that hurts them, so what? Anyone interested in forcing you to do/say/think anything fake, anything you don’t believe or don’t want to, isn’t anyone you need to have in your life. They can’t just be ignored anymore, they must be defeated and destroyed, thoroughly.

Whether you’re some delusional dude in a pool or one of the hags on “The View” who thought Jill Biden was a real doctor who should be Surgeon General who now speaks of Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court as the greatest legal mind in the country, when you’d never heard her name before a month ago exclusively because of the color of her skin, I don’t care. You aren’t “marginalized” by anything other than the garbage progressives have been filling your head with. If you don’t tell them to get bent, you aren’t a victim, you’re the perp.

Either way, I don’t care. It’s your life, if you want to spend it smoking crack all day, knock yourself out. I don’t care how you waste your life, just don’t expect me to subsidize or cheer it and I’ll return that favor. You want anything more than that, go to hell.

2/2

>>15902946

>>15902966

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)

The New World Order (NWO) is a conspiracy theory which hypothesizes a secretly emerging totalitarian world government.

The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian one-world government—which will replace sovereign nation-states

—and an all-encompassing propaganda whose ideology hails the establishment of the New World Order as the culmination of history's progress.

Many influential historical and contemporary figures have therefore been alleged to be part of a cabal that operates through many front organizations to orchestrate significant political and financial events, ranging from causing systemic crises to pushing through controversial policies, at both national and international levels, as steps in an ongoing plot to achieve world domination.

Before the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was limited to two American countercultures, primarily the militantly anti-government right, and secondarily the part of fundamentalist Christianity concerned with the end-time emergence of the Antichrist.

Skeptics, such as Michael Barkun and Chip Berlet, observed that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about a New World Order had not only been embraced by many seekers of stigmatized knowledge but had seeped into popular culture, thereby inaugurating a period during the late 20th and early 21st centuries in the United States where people are actively preparing for apocalyptic millenarian scenarios.

Those political scientists are concerned that mass hysteria over New World Order conspiracy theories could eventually have devastating effects on American political life, ranging from escalating lone-wolf terrorism to the rise to power of authoritarian ultranationalist demagogues.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics)

The term "new world order" refers to a new period of history evidencing dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power in international relations. Despite varied interpretations of this term, it is primarily associated with the ideological notion of world governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address global problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve.

The phrase "new world order" or similar language was used in the period toward the end of the First World War in relation to Woodrow Wilson's vision for international peace;

[a] Wilson called for a League of Nations to prevent aggression and conflict. The League of Nations failed, and neither Franklin Roosevelt nor Harry S. Truman used the phrase "new world order" much when speaking publicly on international peace and cooperation.

Indeed, in some instances when Roosevelt used the phrase "new world order", or "new order in the world" it was to refer to Axis powers plans for world domination.

Truman speeches have phrases such as, "better world order", "peaceful world order", "moral world order" and "world order based on law" but not so much "new world order".

Although Roosevelt and Truman may have been hesitant to use the phrase commentators have applied the term retroactively to the order put in place by the World War II victors including the United Nations and the Bretton Woods system as a "new world order."

The most widely discussed application of the phrase of recent times came at the end of the Cold War. Presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and George H. W. Bush used the term to try to define the nature of the post-Cold War era and the spirit of great power cooperation that they hoped might materialize. Gorbachev's initial formulation was wide-ranging and idealistic, but his ability to press for it was severely limited by the internal crisis of the Soviet system. In comparison, Bush's vision was not less circumscribed: "A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known".

However, given the new unipolar status of the United States, Bush's vision was realistic in saying that "there is no substitute for American leadership".

The Gulf War of 1991 was regarded as the first test of the new world order: "Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. … The Gulf War put this new world to its first test".