Anonymous ID: 74c5d3 March 20, 2022, 7:18 p.m. No.15908373   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8461 >>8886

>>15908164

Hey guys just coming in fresh quick question

 

Since Truth only allows Iphones, and Trump hired a tech guy to build Truth that is being openly disrespectful to anyone that cannot log in (and there's no support, the number you get is meaningless and it's not in order, and then the gall to put a daily update that the site is running properly, etc), obviously one cannot rationally assume that anything that happens on that platform would be important for human beings to know, or otherwise truthsocial and everyone involved in it don't care about human beings knowing it. Which obviously isn't possible.

 

So, what am I missing here? People think that Q is on the side of the people, but is posting on an exclusive network that is itself a clone of free speech platforms? What gives?

Anonymous ID: 74c5d3 March 20, 2022, 7:29 p.m. No.15908470   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15908272

At least they aren't convincing us to become homeless on the internet as we bounce back and forth between various centralized platforms getting shadowbanned, softcensored, and otherwise gaslighted, until ultimately banned, deplatformed, or given the runaround, depending on clout

Anonymous ID: 74c5d3 March 20, 2022, 8:34 p.m. No.15908903   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15908886

Forgive me if a famous billionaire starts a website that is in beta after lifting the code from a functional website

  • doesn't provide support

  • doesn't want bug reports

  • doesn't want non i-phone users

 

But hey, this is what they do to all of the potentially world changing voices, relegated to obscurity in an anachronistic non-functioning platform