One of the key virtues of Trump as a leader (even putting aside all the deeper Q stuff) is that he decisively rejected the aggressive warmongering practiced by both R and D politicians in recent decades (even as he showed willingness to strike harshly and directly against actual enemies as needed).
And yet some anons have convinced themselves that Putin could be a good guy, not in spite of, but BECAUSE OF his aggressive warmongering.
The STRONGEST pro-Putin arguments are basically emulations of W's arguments for the invasion of Iraq (the government is infested with evil and has WMD's).
But that war was a DISASTER and almost no one with any sense today thinks it was a good thing.
By any reasonable standard, Saddam's Iraqi government was FAR MORE EVIL than any reasonable depiction of the government of Ukraine.
His sons would go to public events, see nicely-dressed twelve-year-old girls, and send instructions that they should be brought in for a "visit".
They were SICK.
And Saddam was ABSOLUTELY in cahoots with other evildoers around the world.
The Iraq War was STILL A DISASTER.
But it benefitted the ultra-rich powerbrokers behind the scenes.
Just as Putin's war in Ukraine is doing now.