>>15916921

I do like and respect James, but he's (sadly) one of the most outspoken anti Q/pizzagate/Trump persons in the alt media. I always cringe when he's calling us names but won't discuss the subject in detail (the info Q gave combined combined with the confirmations and connections) but acts as his view is and can be the only correct one and doesn't consider he possible doesn't has the info we have, and by refusing to talk about it, he won't get it either.

He refuses to see and even consider there is a coordinated global longterm war/fight against the real terrorists.

But, his 9-11, Gates, war history, financial, etc. info (and his show notes) are from very high quality.

>>15917211

I disagree, there always have been comms outside this platform. Every confirmation is because one of the confirmation sides where from outside this platform. From Trump words, tweets from trump (jr) or defence, etc. until hint drops as 17 and q signs.

>>15917248

Your interpretation, not what was said.

I could easy say, double meaning, so "no=yes" and because of the confirmations = comms, it leads towards that imo.

The comms connected with tweets is resulting towards direct two-way communications with anons for instance, look at the tweet responses on Scavino his Q related/hinted tweets.

Just my take on it.

>>15917273

He gets cancelled anyway (youtube erased because his "science episode), that's not his concern at all, he always said that and expected that. It's just his true believe, that's clear on how he talks about the subject and us.

Doesn't make the info he does produce less relevant and of less quality, just makes me happy i can place it in a slightly other perspective then him. Like in his last episode his rant against Putin and Trump, without Q perspective, it's total reasonable and provable, but if you consider a global (anti pedo/deepstate/money printing/power) war where Trump and possible Putin are fighting on one side, combined with reason past proofs/events (from 9-11 till Epstein/Maxwell and Hunter, etc) the same info gets total other implications and conclusions.

>>15917339

So, all the pictures of Trump with 17, are no comms? So, all his rally Q sign's are no comms?

Can go on and on with comms made towards us with all have resulted in "confirmations of Q that have been made outside this board.

Rabbit no comm? Picture's with Kim, no comms? etc. etc.

"Learn our comms"

>>15917386

IMO, comms where already made outside this platform before we ever heard of Q.

Like Trump mentioning in 2011 #Pizzagate, you think that's a coincidence? I don't.

If/When Q returns, he can (and will imo.) easy proof he's the real deal, just posting a new picture out of the airplane seconds taken after the first one and 2nd one he used to reconfirm his ID.

I have it stored somewhere, wil look. Found it.

>>15917470

No!