>>15917478 (reposted from the end of the last bread)

>>15917522 (l/b)

2018, Putin named some regiments after current NATO/military targets inside Ukraine

See article:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/russia-systematically-destroying-nato-sites-ukraine/

This article brings up some foggy questions.

Trump has been touting for the past month that he is responsible for the weapons build-up in Ukraine, and that Putin would and did not attempt to invade Ukraine while Trump was president.

Meanwhile, in 2018 Putin named some of his military regiments after current targets sending a clear message to NATO/US that Putin knew what was going on. (See article above)

Here's the foggy questions.

1) Did Putin delay attack in 2018 because there was a verbal secret agreement between Trump/Putin to not use the Russian military against these and other sites until after Trump was out of office to provide Trump cover in the form of "I was tough on Putin, Biden weak", "peace thru strength", etc.?

2) Was naming the regiments after the targets the only way Putin could send secret comms to Trump on which areas would be targeted post-Trump, so that Trump could tell which staff was withholding info from Trump?

3) Did Trump need to agree to let certain provocative events occur in Ukraine in order to be used as the reason by Putin for an invasion post-Trump so that the bio-labs, NATO presence, neo-Nazis, Azov, etc. be exposed during Russia's invasion? Putin warned for years Ukraine is the red line. Don't bring NATO in, no military build-up etc.

4) Trump contradiction. Wanted peace, wanted good relationship with Russia restored. But instead, sends military equipment to Russia - which provoked the current situation in part. Obama sent blankets, body armor, etc. but not weapons (2014), citing not wanting to provoke a proxy war.

5) Did Obama want to keep peace in Ukraine (i.e. not provoke a proxy war) in order to hide/protect the bio-labs and the offensive hacking sites in Ukraine?

6) Did Trump/Putin want/agree to provoke a proxy war to expose the bio-labs/offensive hacking sites/etc post-Trump?

7) July 26, 2018 - Putin passes soccer ball to Trump AFTER the closed door private meeting that freaked out the deep state and MSM.

8) Did Putin hand Trump the evidence during the closed door private meeting, possibly on a microdot type chip on/in the soccer ball?

IS THIS A COINCIDENCE?

"In July of 2018, Radio Free Europe reported that Ukraine was upset because Russia was naming some of its military units after Ukrainian cities" (see article above)

What do ANONS think about this?

>>15917632 (reposted from the end of the last bread)

Admission From Zelenskyy Highlights How Biden Administration Wanted To Provoke Russia To Invade Ukraine

March 21, 2022 | Sundance | 296 Comments

Hopefully by now everyone is well aware how the U.S. State Department has been manipulating the internal politics of Ukraine for well over a decade.

A recent statement, by current Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, puts the weeks leading up to the Russian invasion into greater clarity.

In an interview with CNN, Zelenskyy spoke about his prior communication with Joe Biden and NATO leadership. Within the interview Zelenskyy said (emphasis mine):

“I requested them personally to say directly that we are going to accept you into NATO in a year or two or five, just say it directly and clearly, or just say no,” Zelensky said. “And the response was very clear, you’re not going to be a NATO member, but publicly, the doors will remain open,” he said. {CITATION)

So, privately NATO and the Biden administration were telling Zelenskyy Ukraine was never going to be in NATO, yet they told him they were going to publicly act like the possibility existed. There was no way for Ukraine to enter NATO, but they were going to pretend he could. Why would they do this?

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/21/admission-from-zelenskyy-highlights-how-biden-administration-wanted-to-provoke-russia-to-invade-ukraine/

>>15917640

>>15917632

But does that make sense?

Why would the Biden Admin /NATO want to provoke war in Ukraine, when Putin had already telegraphed that:

1) Russia knew about the US funded bio-labs

2) Russia knew the locations of the NATO hacking sites, and named some of his regiments after them.

3) Telegraphed loud and clear that joining NATO was the red-line.

If Biden admin provoked the war, US/NATO guaranteed the destruction of their own sites in Ukraine.

Did the Biden admin actually tell Zelensky that Ukraine was privately already a member of NATO, but that they would never state it publicly to avoid provoking the proxy war w/Russia?

>>15917691

>This was/is a direct threat and provocation to Russia and they knew/know it.

True.

Why provoke it?

And why would Trump escalate the provocation by sending Javelins, etc.?

Did Obama/Trump/NATO want to trigger a war in order to cut Russia off from the world via isolation/sanctions - to totally collapse Russia?

I have a hard time with that thought.

Trump told us early on, he didn't like Russia's form of government, however, he respected Russia's right to be a sovereign nation. So why would Trump specifically escalate tensions w/Russia?

Contradictions don't exist.

Obama/NATO labs in Ukraine, training in NATO, corruption deals via Biden etal, - they would want those sites to remain dark/hidden.

Trump openly provoked Russia - sanctions, weapons. Trump brings Biden etal corruption to light during impeachment timeframe. Doesn't shed light on the bio-labs or hacking. That comes out mostly post-invasion (at least for the masses).

>>15917868

I remember back in 2007 watching CNBC - and they were talking about Putin influencing China/India etc to buy gold to start process of destroying the USD as a reserve currency.

There was an article (last week?) about Russia's gold outside of the country being (frozen?) Forget the details. Some odd moves by Russia CB

>>15917850

Who is investigating these massive crimes?

The ICC seems hell bent on proving Putin is the war criminal, instead of looking at who is behind the bio-labs. Who controls the ICC?

And if that is the case, then yes a good thing evidence was collected long ago, at least that depends on who collected it and who is investigating.

Do the results of the ICC investigation into war crimes in Ukraine previously reveal who controls the ICC?

>>15917766

So, if they get Putin out, they use the ICC to prove the case of Putin war crimes, etc. and control their corruption/crimes etc in Ukraine.

I find your comment about anti-Christ very interesting.

Was Trump played?